Objective: The most important aspect of managing heart failure (HF) is preventing rehospitalization. Bundle branch block (BBB), particularly left BBB (LBBB), has been a known risk factor for worsening prognosis, whereas no such consideration has been made for right BBB (RBBB). However, recent research has shown that RBBB was associated with increased mortality. This study evaluated the effects of RBBB on prognosis, especially rehospitalization, in patients with HF.
Materials: This study included 698 patients admitted for HF. Those who died in the hospital (n = 31) and dropped out during observation (n = 143) were excluded. After one year of observation, the patients were divided into a control group (n = 361) and a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) group (n = 163). After further excluding according to electrocardiography findings, patients were categorized as having no BBB (n = 307), pure RBBB (n = 37), and LBBB (n = 56), and then the characteristics, clinical data, and prognosis of the remaining patients were evaluated.
Results: Patients were compared to no BBB, pure RBBB, and LBBB was associated with a risk for HF rehospitalization (p = 0.007). Furthermore, pure RBBB was independently associated with HF rehospitalization even after adjusting for confounders (hazard ratio: 2.40 (95% confidence interval: 1.26-4.58; p = 0.008).
Conclusion: Pure RBBB was independently associated with HF rehospitalization, highlighting the need for vigilance against the risk of HF rehospitalization among those with pure RBBB.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375113 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66238 | DOI Listing |
Cureus
August 2024
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, JPN.
Objective: The most important aspect of managing heart failure (HF) is preventing rehospitalization. Bundle branch block (BBB), particularly left BBB (LBBB), has been a known risk factor for worsening prognosis, whereas no such consideration has been made for right BBB (RBBB). However, recent research has shown that RBBB was associated with increased mortality.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Arrhythm
August 2023
Department of Cardiology Medica Superspeciality Kolkata India.
During ventricular extra stimuli(VES) protocol a VA jump was noted. In upper panel with VES @ 500/270 ms (Fig A) the His signal appeared after the A-EGM, ruling out pure nodal VA conduction and confirming presence of an accessory pathway (AP). The H signal was delayed due to probable retrograde RBBB.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIndian Pacing Electrophysiol J
August 2021
Dept of Cardiology, RTIICS, Kolkata, India.
Parahisian pacing (PHP) is a useful maneuver during electrophysiology study of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) especially when the tachycardia is non-sustained. Various responses during PHP can differentiate between the routes of VA conduction (VAC). In a case of WPW syndrome with orthodromic re-entrant tachycardia, we encountered various responses which one must be cognizant about to avoid erroneous conclusions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCirc Arrhythm Electrophysiol
August 2014
From the St. Vincent Medical Group, Indianapolis, IN.
Background: Definitive diagnosis of bilateral bundle-branch delay/block may be made when catheter-induced right bundle-branch block (RBBB) develops in patients with baseline left bundle-branch (LBB) block. We hypothesized that a RBBB pattern with absent S waves in leads I and aVL will identify bilateral bundle-branch delay/block.
Methods And Results: Fifty patients developing transient RBBB pattern in lead V1 during right heart catheterization were studied.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
January 2013
Medtronic Inc., Bakken Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Aims: The role of right bundle branch block (RBBB) for the induction of left ventricular (LV) asynchrony is discussed controversially. The objective of this study was to assess presence and degree of LV asynchrony in patients with RBBB, left bundle branch block (LBBB), or left anterior hemiblock (LAH) and normal LV function.
Methods: We included 15 patients with RBBB, 13 patients with RBBB and concomitant LAH, 10 patients with pure LBBB, and 100 healthy controls into this study.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!