AI Article Synopsis

  • Diagnostic errors are the top threat to patient safety, making it crucial to learn from both successful and failed diagnoses.
  • Root cause analyses (RCAs) should start right after an incident, and those directly involved in the diagnosis should be included in the RCA team.
  • The RCA process must examine the clinical reasoning approach and consider system-related factors to effectively identify root causes and develop interventions.

Article Abstract

Diagnostic errors comprise the leading threat to patient safety in healthcare today. Learning how to extract the lessons from cases where diagnosis succeeds or fails is a promising approach to improve diagnostic safety going forward. We present up-to-date and authoritative guidance on how the existing approaches to conducting root cause analyses (RCA's) can be modified to study cases involving diagnosis. There are several diffierences: In cases involving diagnosis, the investigation should begin immediately after the incident, and clinicians involved in the case should be members of the RCA team. The review must include consideration of how the clinical reasoning process went astray (or succeeded), and use a human-factors perspective to consider the system-related contextual factors in the diagnostic process. We present detailed instructions for conducting RCA's of cases involving diagnosis, with advice on how to identify root causes and contributing factors and select appropriate interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0102DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cases involving
16
involving diagnosis
16
cases
5
diagnosis
5
root analysis
4
analysis cases
4
involving
4
diagnosis diagnostic
4
diagnostic errors
4
errors comprise
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!