Shoe prints are one of the most common types of evidence found at crime scenes, second only to fingerprints. However, studies involving modern approaches such as machine learning and deep learning for the detection and analysis of shoe prints are quite limited in this field. With advancements in technology, positive results have recently emerged for the detection of 2D shoe prints. However, few studies focusing on 3D shoe prints. This study aims to use deep learning methods, specifically the PointNet architecture, for binary classification applications of 3D shoe prints, utilizing two different shoe brands. A 3D dataset created from 160 pairs of shoes was employed for this research. This dataset comprises 797 images from the Adidas brand and 2445 images from the Nike brand. The dataset used in the study includes worn shoe prints. According to the results obtained, the training phase achieved an accuracy of 96%, and the validation phase achieved an accuracy of 93%. These study results are highly positive and indicate promising potential for classifying 3D shoe prints. This study is described as the first classification study conducted using a deep learning method specifically on 3D shoe prints. It provides proof of concept that deep learning research can be conducted on 3D shoeprints. While the developed binary classification of these 3D shoeprints may not fully meet current forensic needs, it will serve as a source of motivation for future research and for the creation of 3D datasets intended for forensic purposes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12024-024-00877-6 | DOI Listing |
Forensic Sci Int
December 2024
Department of Security and Crime Science, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK; UCL Centre for the Forensic Sciences, University College London, 35 Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9EZ, UK. Electronic address:
Systematic reviews have been shown to be useful tools mainly in terms of identifying research areas, but the approach is less common in forensic science. Systematic reviews in forensic science have generally focused on topics closely linked to medicine or to the general practice of forensic science, such as cognitive bias or misleading evidence. The value of a systematic review is dependent on its transparency and reproducibility and, it is therefore of benefit to follow established guidelines, such as those published by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
October 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, USA.
J Foot Ankle Res
December 2024
School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Assist Technol
October 2024
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
This systematic review aimed to explore comprehensive evidence on the efficacy of the 3D-printed ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) on gait parameters in individuals with neuromuscular and/or musculoskeletal ankle impairments. Electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, ProQuest, Cochrane, and EBSCOhost were searched from inception to August 2023. Ten studies that had participants with ankle impairments, as a result of stroke, cerebral palsy, mechanical trauma, muscle weakness, or Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, investigated the immediate effects of the 3D-printed AFOs on gait parameters were included.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!