AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of manual compression (MC) and two suture-based techniques (Fo8 and modified Fo8) for femoral venous haemostasis after electrophysiology procedures, hypothesizing that Fo8 would lead to better short-term bleeding outcomes than MC.
  • In a sample of 1,089 patients, Fo8 showed significantly fewer major and minor complications compared to MC, particularly in those receiving anticoagulation during the procedure.
  • The findings suggest that the Fo8 technique significantly reduces the risk of access site complications after these procedures, indicating it may be a preferred method for achieving haemostasis.

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: Methods for femoral venous haemostasis following electrophysiology (EP) procedures include manual compression (MC) and suture-based techniques such as a figure-of-eight suture secured with a hand-tied knot (Fo8) or a modified figure-of-eight suture secured with a 3-way stopcock (Fo8). We hypothesised that short-term bleeding outcomes using the Fo8 approach would be superior to MC. We additionally compared outcomes between Fo8 and Fo8 approaches.

Methods: We studied consecutive patients undergoing EP procedures at our institution between March and December 2023. Patients were categorised into three haemostasis groups: MC, Fo8 and Fo8. Access site complications were classified as major (requiring intervention or blood transfusion, delaying discharge or resulting in death) or minor (bleeding/haematoma requiring additional compression).

Results: 1089 patients were included: MC 718 (65.9%); Fo8 105 (9.6%); Fo8 266 (24.4%). Procedures were most commonly for atrial fibrillation (52.4%), atrial flutter (10.9%), and atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (10.1%). In patients receiving periprocedural anticoagulation (865, 79.4%), Fo8 associated with fewer complications than MC or Fo8 (major: MC 2.2%, Fo8 6.0%, Fo8 0.8%, p = .01; minor: MC 16.5%, Fo8 12.0%, Fo8 7.4%, p = .002). In patients not receiving periprocedural anticoagulation, complications did not differ between haemostasis methods (total major and minor complications 5.8%, p = .729 for between groups rates). On multivariable logistic regression, Fo8 was associated with a significantly lower risk of access site complications (OR 0.29 [95% CI 0.17-0.48], p < .001), whilst intraprocedural heparinisation (OR 5.25 [2.88-9.69], p < .001) and larger maximal sheath size (OR 1.06 [1.00-1.11], p = .04) were associated with a higher risk of complications.

Conclusion: Femoral haemostasis with Fo8 associates with fewer access site complications than MC and Fo8 following EP procedures that need periprocedural anticoagulation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jce.16417DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fo8
16
suture-based techniques
8
manual compression
8
femoral venous
8
venous haemostasis
8
haemostasis electrophysiology
8
electrophysiology procedures
8
figure-of-eight suture
8
suture secured
8
outcomes fo8
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!