Improved Risk Prediction Using a Refined European Guidelines Instrument in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Related to Congenital Heart Disease.

Am J Cardiol

Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart Centre, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated a goal-oriented treatment approach for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), focusing on revised risk assessment tools and their effectiveness in predicting outcomes.
  • A total of 223 participants were analyzed, revealing that the standard risk grouping did not show significant survival differences, prompting the researchers to propose new thresholds for better risk classification.
  • The newly refined instrument successfully reclassified 29% of patients and demonstrated that those with improved low-risk profiles had better survival rates, suggesting that the original PAH risk instrument may have limited applicability for the PAH-CHD population.

Article Abstract

The European guidelines advocate a goal-oriented treatment approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), based on a comprehensive risk assessment instrument, which has been validated in several PAH subgroups. We investigated its discriminatory ability and explored tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and revised thresholds to improve its predictability within the adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population. In total, 223 adults (42 ± 16 years, 66% women, 68% Eisenmenger) were enrolled from 5 European PAH-CHD expert centers. Patients were classified as low, intermediate, or high risk at the baseline visit and at follow-up within 4 to 18 months. By the general PAH guidelines instrument, survival did not differ between the risk groups (p-value not significant), mostly because of the skewed group distribution. Reclassifying patients using revised thresholds for N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and 6-minute walk distance (i.e., low, intermediate, and high as <500, 500 to 1,400, >1,400 ng/L and >400, and 165 to 400 and <165 m, respectively) and use of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (low, intermediate, and high as >20, 16 to 20, and <16 mm, respectively) significantly improved the discrimination between the risk groups at baseline and follow-up (p = 0.001, receiver operating characteristic increase from 0.648 to 0.701), reclassifying 64 patients (29%). Irrespective of follow-up risk group, survival was better for patients with higher proportions of low-risk variables. Improvement to a low-risk profile at a median of 9 months of follow-up provided improved survival compared with the survival of patients who remained in the low-risk group. In conclusion, the external validity of general risk instrument for PAH appeared to be of limited discriminatory value in patients with PAH-CHD. We propose a refined risk instrument with improved discrimination for PAH-CHD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.08.027DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

european guidelines
8
guidelines instrument
8
pulmonary arterial
8
arterial hypertension
8
congenital heart
8
heart disease
8
revised thresholds
8
low intermediate
8
intermediate high
8
improved risk
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!