Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCST) is a widely used therapy in the management of hematological malignancies, leading to cytopenias that require transient transfusions. Platelet recovery (PR) following HSCT is assessed by monitoring platelet count (PC). Immature platelet fraction (IPF) is a research parameter offered by Sysmex® on XN series analyzers, enabling rapid diagnostic orientation in the event of thrombocytopenia. It has also been described as a predictive factor for PR after chemotherapy or HSCT, and thresholds have been proposed.
Methods: The objective of this study was to assess the predictive capability of IPF for PR in a prospective cohort of patients undergoing HSCT and to evaluate its utility in guiding platelet transfusion decision.
Results: An optimized A-IPF (absolute number of IPF) threshold of 2.5 × 10/L was predictive of a PC greater than 50 × 10/L at day 30 with a sensitivity of 78.9%, specificity of 78.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 83.3% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 73.3%. We were able to distinguish patients recovering PC before day 15 with an earlier %IPF peak, greater IPF recovery kinetics and faster neutrophil recovery.
Conclusion: A-IPF shows promise as a predictor of PR following HSCT. A multicenter study could help confirm both A-IPF and %IPF (IPF) clinical utility before it is made available to clinicians.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14358 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!