AI Article Synopsis

  • The heart condition atrial fibrillation (AF) is linked to problems like atrial fibrosis and changes in nerve signals, which can affect how fast electrical signals move through the heart's atrium.* -
  • Doctors studied data from 54 patients to see how different factors including heart voltage and nerve stimulation affected the speed of these signals and where they changed direction, known as pivot points.* -
  • The findings showed that the type of heart tissue and nerve activity can slow down these signals and create more areas where the signals change direction, helping us understand how AF works better.*

Article Abstract

Aims: Atrial fibrosis and autonomic remodelling are proposed pathophysiological mechanisms in atrial fibrillation (AF). Their impact on conduction velocity (CV) dynamics and wavefront propagation was evaluated.

Methods And Results: Local activation times (LATs), voltage, and geometry data were obtained from patients undergoing ablation for persistent AF. LATs were obtained at three pacing intervals (PIs) in sinus rhythm (SR). LATs were used to determine CV dynamics and their relationship to local voltage amplitude. The impact of autonomic modulation- pharmacologically and with ganglionated plexi (GP) stimulation, on CV dynamics, wavefront propagation, and pivot points (change in wavefront propagation of ≥90°) was determined in SR. Fifty-four patients were included. Voltage impacted CV dynamics whereby at non-low voltage zones (LVZs) (≥0.5 mV) the CV restitution curves are steeper [0.03 ± 0.03 m/s ΔCV PI 600-400 ms (PI1), 0.54 ± 0.09 m/s ΔCV PI 400-250 ms (PI2)], broader at LVZ (0.2-0.49 mV) (0.17 ± 0.09 m/s ΔCV PI1, 0.25 ± 0.11 m/s ΔCV PI2), and flat at very LVZ (<0.2 mV) (0.03 ± 0.01 m/s ΔCV PI1, 0.04 ± 0.02 m/s ΔCV PI2). Atropine did not change CV dynamics, while isoprenaline and GP stimulation resulted in greater CV slowing with rate. Isoprenaline (2.7 ± 1.1 increase/patient) and GP stimulation (2.8 ± 1.3 increase/patient) promoted CV heterogeneity, i.e. rate-dependent CV (RDCV) slowing sites. Most pivot points co-located to RDCV slowing sites (80.2%). Isoprenaline (1.3 ± 1.1 pivot increase/patient) and GP stimulation (1.5 ± 1.1 increase/patient) also enhanced the number of pivot points identified.

Conclusion: Atrial CV dynamics is affected by fibrosis burden and influenced by autonomic modulation which enhances CV heterogeneity and distribution of pivot points. This study provides further insight into the impact of autonomic remodelling in AF.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372476PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae219DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wavefront propagation
16
dynamics wavefront
12
conduction velocity
8
velocity dynamics
8
009 m/s Δcv
8
dynamics
5
autonomic modulation
4
modulation impacts
4
impacts conduction
4
wavefront
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!