A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prevention of resistance to spinosad by a combination of spinosad and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis in Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae). | LitMetric

Background: Spinosad consists of spinosyn A and spinosyn D that are produced by the soil-dwelling actinomycete Saccharopolyspora spinosa. It has been used to control a wide variety of arthropod pests of economic importance. Formulations of spinosad have been used to control larval mosquitoes since approximately 2010. However, the target site- and metabolism-based resistance to this neurotoxin has been reported since 2000 in agricultural pests The current studies aim to further evaluate resistance risk and develop resistance prevention tactics in the southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus.

Results: The first comparison group involved selection at lethal concentration, 75% (LC) of technical spinosad for 30 generations, resulting in baseline resistance ratios (RRs) of 51.1-fold at LC and 45.4-fold at LC in Cx. quinquefasciatus. However, under the same conditions, selection by a combination of spinosad and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis (B.t.i.), negated resistance development to spinosad, RRs ranging 1.00-1.75-fold at LC and 0.83-1.76-fold at LC. At the same time, the selected population remained susceptible to the combination throughout the selection process, RRs fluctuating 0.74-1.38-fold at LC and 0.63-1.23-fold at LC.

Conclusion: Combination of spinosad and B.t.i. negates resistance development to spinosad, as opposed to spinosad alone in Cx. quinquefasciatus. Moreover, the species tested does not develop resistance to this combination upon repeated exposures, implying the potential for further developing this combination as a viable product for larval mosquito control. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.8397DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

combination spinosad
12
spinosad
10
spinosad bacillus
8
bacillus thuringiensis
8
thuringiensis subsp
8
subsp israelensis
8
develop resistance
8
resistance development
8
development spinosad
8
resistance
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!