A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Successful Application of Buccal Mucosal Graft Transplant in Resistant Suture Exposure of Transscleral-Sutured Posterior Chamber Intraocular Lens. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Efforts such as tenoplasty and amniotic membrane transplant failed to control the exposure, leading to the decision to use an oral (buccal) mucosal graft as a solution.
  • The oral mucosal graft successfully healed the previously exposed area, demonstrating its effectiveness for ocular reconstructions and suggesting it can be a useful alternative for similar conditions.

Article Abstract

We report the successful reconstruction of suture exposure with the oral mucosal graft in a patient with suture exposure after transscleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. The 70-year-old patient had a history of vitreoretinal surgery and transscleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation after complicated cataract surgery. He was referred to our department because of suture exposure. The best-corrected visual acuity was 20/2000 OD and 20/50 OS. We observed exposed PC9 sutures from both the nasal and temporal conjunctiva in the right eye. The patient showed appearance of scleromalacia in the same regions, so scleral flap surgery was not considered. Despite both tenoplasty and amniotic membrane transplant procedures, exposure could not be controlled. Instead, the patient received oral (buccal) mucosal graft transplant to the resistant exposure areas. A single layer of protective amniotic membrane was transplanted over the buccal mucosal graft. This method resulted in effective control of the exposed area. In conclusion, an oral mucosal graft can be used in many ocular pathologies that require conjunctival reconstruction because of the simplicity of tissue excision from the mucosa, allowing adequate tissue excision, durability of the obtained tissue, and ease of use. Our case report highlights that resistant transscleral-sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens suture exposure can be successfully managed with oral mucosal grafting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6002/ect.2023.0319DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mucosal graft
20
suture exposure
20
transscleral-sutured posterior
16
posterior chamber
16
chamber intraocular
16
intraocular lens
16
buccal mucosal
12
oral mucosal
12
graft transplant
8
transplant resistant
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!