Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To examine the increased use of chairside CAD/CAM among Chinese dental practitioners, and to explore the existing barriers influencing its further application and satisfaction levels.
Methods: A semi-structured questionnaire was developed to gather respondents' demographic information, as well as their experiences and behaviours regarding the implementation of chairside CAD/CAM. A specialised web-based survey system and WeChat were used to display and distribute the final questionnaire. Then, the data were analysed with Chi-square tests and regression analyses to determine the effects of various demographic variables on chairside CAD/ CAM applications.
Results: A total of 1,969 questionnaire responses were included in the analyses. Chairside CAD/ CAM systems were used by 36.9% of participants, with a higher usage rate observed among prosthodontists (60.0%) and dental practitioners holding a PhD degree (57.7%). Chairside CAD/ CAM-fabricated prostheses were most commonly used in the posterior maxilla (83.3%) and mandible (86.0%), followed by the anterior maxilla and mandible (63.8% and 48.6%, respectively). Major barriers to further application included high initial investment, frequent updates of equipment and software programs, and a lack of expertise in chairside CAD/CAM usage.
Conclusion: Most dental practitioners did not use chairside CAD/CAM systems. The application rate was significantly influenced by sex, location, educational background, department and type of healthcare facility. Chairside CAD/CAM users showed limited satisfaction with the aesthetic performance of the fabricated prostheses. To improve the popularity of chairside CAD/CAM systems, especially among dental practitioners lacking advanced academic degrees, it is highly advisable to optimise CAD software programs and offer comprehensive training opportunities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b5698327 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!