A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Surgical resection and neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastric cancer and ovarian metastasis: A real-world study. | LitMetric

Background: Regarding when to treat gastric cancer and ovarian metastasis (GCOM) and whether to have metastatic resection surgery, there is presently debate on a global scale. The purpose of this research is to examine, in real-world patients with GCOM, the survival rates and efficacy of metastatic non-metastasized resection.

Aim: To investigate the survival time and efficacy of metastatic surgery and neoadjuvant therapy in patients with GCOM.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the data of 41 GCOM patients admitted to Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from June 2009 to July 2023. The diagnosis of all patients was confirmed by pathology. The primary study endpoints included overall survival (OS), ovarian survival, OS after surgery (OSAS), disease-free survival (DFS), differences in efficacy.

Results: This study had 41 patients in total. The surgical group ( = 27) exhibited significantly longer median OS (mOS) and median overall months (mOM) compared to the nonoperative group ( = 14) (mOS: 23.0 6.9 months, = 0.015; mOM: 18.3 3.8 months, = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences observed in mOS, mOM, median OSAS (mOSAS), and median DFS (mDFS) between patients in the surgical resection plus neoadjuvant therapy group ( = 11) and those who surgical resection without neoadjuvant therapy group ( = 16) (mOS: 26.1 months 21.8 months, = 0.189; mOM: 19.8 15.2 months, = 0.424; mOSAS: 13.9 8.7 months, = 0.661, mDFS: 5.1 8.2 months, = 0.589).

Conclusion: Compared to the non-surgical group, the surgical group's survival duration and efficacy are noticeably longer. The efficacy and survival time of the direct surgery group and the neoadjuvant therapy group did not differ significantly.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362938PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2426DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

neoadjuvant therapy
20
surgical resection
12
resection neoadjuvant
12
therapy group
12
therapy patients
8
gastric cancer
8
cancer ovarian
8
ovarian metastasis
8
efficacy metastatic
8
survival time
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!