AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines the rising occurrence of scar site pregnancy following cesarean sections in women seeking maternal health services in Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
  • It utilized a case-control design with 50 women, focusing on demographic data and risk factors, analyzed using statistical software.
  • Results indicated that factors like the number of childbirths, pregnancy intervals, and recent use of intrauterine contraceptive devices significantly predicted cesarean scar pregnancies, with combined methotrexate and aspiration being common treatment methods.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy located outside the uterine cavity following a cesarean section has become more prevalent in recent years due to the increase in cesarean section delivery. This study sought to investigate the prevalence, determinants, and treatment options of scar site pregnancy among women who sought maternal and child health services in a hospital in Buraydah, Al-Qassim region, Saudi Arabia.

Methods: Utilizing a quantitative retrospective case-control design, 50 women were recruited and assigned to the two groups evenly. Demographic data and risk factors were assessed using a questionnaire, and data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 at a 95% confidence interval and presented in tables and figures.

Results: Fifty-eight percent of the participants were aged 35 years and above, with 38% reporting a parity of 1-3. Logistic regression revealed that parity (odds ratio (OR) = 10.975, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.887-135.861, and p-value = 0.062), the interval between the last and present pregnancies (OR = 0.056, 95% CI = 0.005-0.668, p-value = 0.023), intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) use in the last year (OR = 0.070, 95% CI = 0.006 -0.780, p-value = 0.031) were statistically significant in predicting cesarean scar pregnancy. Combined methotrexate and aspiration were the most prevalent treatment options for scar site pregnancy in this study.

Conclusion: Scar site pregnancy is a maternal health complication that affects women across all healthcare settings, and its prevalence is not clear due to underdiagnosis and underreporting. The risk of scar site pregnancy increased with an increase in the number of childbirths (parity) and the interval between the last and current pregnancies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11364361PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.65874DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

scar site
20
site pregnancy
20
options scar
12
prevalence determinants
8
pregnancy women
8
al-qassim region
8
treatment options
8
95% confidence
8
confidence interval
8
pregnancy
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!