Introduction: In May 2022, lawmakers in Oklahoma passed House Bill 4327, which outlawed abortion after fertilization. The governor signed the bill on May 25, 2022. It is uncertain whether these changes will motivate more men in Oklahoma to undergo vasectomy.
Materials And Methods: Males seeking vasectomy were informed of the study and asked to participate. Participants filled out a survey regarding their marital status, number of children, fertility treatment history, and their influences in making the decision to pursue vasectomy. We removed the identifying information from the survey. After collection, the data was imported to a database. Medical records were investigated to confirm patients underwent the procedure.
Results: Of the 126 participants, 116 underwent vasectomy. Patients who did not undergo vasectomy tended to be older (38.4 vs. 34.2, p = 0.03). Participants who underwent vasectomy and were concerned about abortion laws tended to be married (69.7 vs. 30.3%, p = 0.04) with fewer children (1.2 vs. 2.3, p < 0.0001). When correlating specifically "concern about abortion laws" and going through with vasectomy, the risk ratio of 1.12 (95% CI 1.04, 1.20) indicates that patients concerned about abortion laws were slightly more likely to undergo vasectomy.
Conclusions: Over 26% of men said that their decisions were somewhat impacted by abortion law changes. The concern about abortion law changes seemed to be predictive of patients undergoing vasectomy. Continued data collection will help determine whether there is a time-sensitive nature regarding the impact of abortion law changes on motivation to vasectomy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Perspectives on Abortion Services, the Pre-Abortion Visit, and Telemedicine Abortion: A Qualitative Study in Sweden.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Context: According to Swedish law, abortion treatment should be carried out at an approved healthcare facility. All persons seeking medication abortions are obliged to attend an in-person visit, which includes a gynecological examination, an ultrasound scan, and administration of mifepristone at a hospital/clinic. However, some countries have implemented telemedicine abortion services without the requirement of in-person visits during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTermination Laws in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand - Do They Align with Midwives' Scope of Practice?
J Law Med
November 2024
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University.
This article examines whether the current termination laws of Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand align with the midwifery scope of practice. It begins with an introduction to termination of pregnancy from a health care perspective. An overview of previous and current legal frameworks in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand that impact upon the provision of termination of pregnancy health services is provided.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMedical Termination of Pregnancy: Law and Controversies in the United States and Australia.
J Law Med
November 2024
Barrister, Castan Chambers, Melbourne, Australia; Professor of Law and Professorial Fellow in Psychiatry, University of Melbourne; Honorary Professor of Forensic Medicine, Monash; Adjunct Professor, Southern Cross University.
This editorial reviews the changes over two decades in the United States and Australia in relation to the law governing access to drugs enabling medical termination of pregnancy. It also scrutinises three contentious decisions by the United States Supreme Court between 2022 and 2024 in relation to abortion. It argues that the receptive environment in the United States Supreme Court, as it is currently constituted, to challenges to the lawfulness of terminations of pregnancy and abortion medications is likely to inspire comparable challenges as part of the "Abortion Wars" in other countries, including Australia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMisreading Medicine: Statutory Prohibitions of Abortion for Disability.
J Med Humanit
January 2025
S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abortion prohibitions in some states include carve-outs based on the medical condition of either the mother or the fetus. These carve-outs, however, may be couched in limiting language structured by legislators rather than in language understandable in the context of medical care. In circumstances where legislative bodies fail to adequately incorporate medical professionals in the drafting of medical laws, the resulting vagueness or ambiguity may lead to a lack of utility or viability.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTubal Sterilization And Vasectomy Increased Among US Young Adults After The Supreme Court Decision In 2022.
Health Aff (Millwood)
January 2025
Julie Maslowsky, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Young adults' access to contraception is shifting after the June 2022 United States Supreme Court decision. This concurrent mixed-methods study measured young adults' use of and perceptions about tubal sterilization and vasectomy after the leaked opinion in May 2022. Using national-level medical claims data from IQVIA, we conducted difference-in-differences analyses of tubal sterilizations and vasectomies by age and state policy; using open-text survey responses from national MyVoice surveys in 2022 and 2023, we thematically analyzed young adults' perspectives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!