Enhanced PROcedural Information READability for Patient-Centered Care in Interventional Radiology With Large Language Models (PRO-READ IR).

J Am Coll Radiol

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; IR Division Quality Director and Co-Director of IR Research and also Director of Precision Interventional and Medical Imaging Lab at the Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital.

Published: January 2025

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study evaluated how well GPT-4 could create understandable patient education materials for common interventional radiology procedures.
  • A total of 10 procedures were assessed, with input from both clinical physicians and nonclinical assessors to measure clarity, appropriateness, and readability.
  • Results indicated GPT-4 generated instructions that were generally appropriate and easier to read than existing patient resources, showing better accessibility for patients in terms of language complexity.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the extent to which Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) can educate patients by generating easily understandable information about the most common interventional radiology (IR) procedures.

Materials And Methods: We reviewed 10 IR procedures and prepared prompts for GPT-4 to provide patient educational instructions about each procedure in layman's terms. The instructions were then evaluated by four clinical physicians and nine nonclinical assessors to determine their clinical appropriateness, understandability, and clarity using a survey. A grade-level readability assessment was performed using validated metrics to evaluate accessibility to a wide patient population. The same procedures were also evaluated from the patient instructions available at radiologyinfo.org and compared with GPT-generated instructions utilizing a paired t test.

Results: Evaluation by four clinical physicians shows that nine GPT-generated instructions were fully appropriate, whereas arterial embolization instructions was somewhat appropriate. Evaluation by nine nonclinical assessors shows that paracentesis, dialysis catheter placement, thrombectomy, ultrasound-guided biopsy, and nephrostomy-tube instructions were rated excellent by 57% and good by 43%. The arterial embolization and biliary-drain instructions were rated excellent by 28.6% and good by 71.4%. In contrast, thoracentesis, port placement, and CT-guided biopsy instructions received 43% excellent, 43% good, and 14% fair. The readability assessment across all procedural instructions showed a better Flesch-Kincaid mean grade of GPT-4 instructions compared with radiologyinfo.org (7.8 ± 0.87 versus 9.6 ± 0.83; P = .007) indicating excellent readability at 7th- to 8th-grade level compared with 9th to 10th grade. Additionally there was a lower Gunning Fog mean index (10.4 ± 1.2 versus 12.7 ± 0.93; P = .006), and higher Flesch Reading Ease mean score (69.4 ± 4.8 versus 51.3±3.9; P = .0001) indicating better readability.

Conclusion: IR procedural instructions generated by GPT-4 can aid in improving health literacy and patient-centered care in IR by generating easily understandable explanations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.08.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

instructions
12
patient-centered care
8
interventional radiology
8
generating easily
8
easily understandable
8
clinical physicians
8
nonclinical assessors
8
readability assessment
8
gpt-generated instructions
8
arterial embolization
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!