External Validation of the ICU-Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment Model in Adult Critically Ill Patients.

Background: Currently, no universally accepted standardized VTE risk assessment model (RAM) is specifically designed for critically ill patients. Although the ICU-venous thromboembolism (ICU-VTE) RAM was initially developed in 2020, it lacks prospective external validation.

Objectives: To evaluate the predictive performance of the ICU-VTE RAM in terms of VTE occurrence in mixed medical-surgical ICU patients.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled adult patients in the ICU. The ICU-VTE score and Caprini or Padua score were calculated at admission, and the incidence of in-hospital VTE was investigated. The performance of the ICU-VTE RAM was evaluated and compared with that of Caprini or Padua RAM using the receiver operating curve.

Results: We included 269 patients (median age: 70 years; 62.5% male). Eighty-three (30.9%) patients experienced inpatient VTE. The AUC of the ICU-VTE RAM was 0.743 (95% CI, 0.682-0.804, < 0.001) for mixed medical-surgical ICU patients. Comparatively, the performance of the ICU-VTE RAM was superior to that of the Pauda RAM (AUC: 0.727 vs 0.583< 0.001) in critically ill medical patients and the Caprini RAM (AUC: 0.774 vs 0.617, 0.128) in critically ill surgical patients, although the latter comparison was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: The ICU-VTE RAM may be a practical and valuable tool for identifying and stratifying VTE risk in mixed medical-surgical critically ill patients, aiding in managing and preventing VTE complications.