Intraprocedural Diffusion-weighted Imaging for Predicting Ablation Zone during MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound of Prostate Cancer.

Radiol Imaging Cancer

From the Departments of Radiology (R.R.B., Y.C., R.L.B., M.R., P.G.) and Urology (G.S.), Stanford University School of Medicine, 1024 Welch Rd, MC 5488, Stanford, CA 94305; and Department of Medical Quantitative Health, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla (W.S.).

Published: September 2024

Purpose To compare diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with thermal dosimetry as a noncontrast method to predict ablation margins in individuals with prostate cancer treated with MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) ablation. Materials and Methods This secondary analysis of a prospective trial (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01657942) included 17 participants (mean age, 64 years ± 6 [SD]; all male) who were treated for prostate cancer using MRgFUS in whom DWI was performed immediately after treatment. Ablation contours from computed thermal dosimetry and DWI as drawn by two blinded radiologists were compared against the reference standard of ablation assessment, posttreatment contrast-enhanced nonperfused volume (NPV) contours. The ability of each method to predict the ablation zone was analyzed quantitively using Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and mean Hausdorff distances (mHDs). Results DWI revealed a hyperintense rim at the margin of the ablation zone. While DWI accurately helped predict treatment margins, thermal dose contours underestimated the extent of the ablation zone compared with the T1-weighted NPV imaging reference standard. Quantitatively, contour assessment between methods showed that DWI-drawn contours matched postcontrast NPV contours (mean DSC = 0.84 ± 0.05 for DWI, mHD = 0.27 mm ± 0.13) better than the thermal dose contours did (mean DSC = 0.64 ± 0.12, mHD = 1.53 mm ± 1.20) ( < .001). Conclusion This study demonstrates that DWI, which can visualize the ablation zone directly, is a promising noncontrast method that is robust to treatment-related bulk motion compared with thermal dosimetry and correlates better than thermal dosimetry with the reference standard T1-weighted NPV. Interventional-Body, Ultrasound-High-Intensity Focused (HIFU), Genital/Reproductive, Prostate, Oncology, Imaging Sequences, MRI-guided Focused Ultrasound, MR Thermometry, Diffusionweighted Imaging, Prostate Cancer ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier no. NCT01657942 © RSNA, 2024.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449221PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ablation zone
20
prostate cancer
16
thermal dosimetry
16
mri-guided focused
12
focused ultrasound
12
reference standard
12
ablation
9
diffusion-weighted imaging
8
noncontrast method
8
method predict
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!