Optimizing Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Based on Intra-Abdominal Pressure in Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure.

Niger J Clin Pract

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Intensive Care, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Türkiye.

Published: August 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the impact of adjusting positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) based on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in mechanically ventilated patients with respiratory failure, focusing on its effects on oxygenation and potential harms.
  • Researchers applied different PEEP levels (0, 50%, and 100% of IAP) to patients, measuring arterial blood gases and mean arterial pressures to evaluate outcomes.
  • Results indicated significant improvements in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio with increased PEEP levels, while ensuring that plateau pressures remained within a safe range, suggesting a beneficial effect on oxygenation without negative side effects.

Article Abstract

Background: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is a crucial component of mechanical ventilation to improve oxygenation in critically ill patients with respiratory failure. The interaction between abdominal and thoracic compartment pressures is known well. Especially in intra-abdominal hypertension, lower PEEP may cause atelectotrauma by repetitive opening and closing of alveoli.

Aim: In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effect of PEEP adjustment according to the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) on oxygenation and clarify possible harms.

Method: Patients older than 18 were mechanically ventilated due to hypoxemic respiratory failure and had normal IAP (<15 mmHg) included in the study. Patients with severe cardiovascular dysfunction were excluded. The following PEEP levels were applied: PEEPzero of 0 cmH2O, PEEPIAP/2 = 50% of IAP, and PEEPIAP = 100% of IAP. After a 30-minute equilibration period, arterial blood gases and mean arterial pressures were measured.

Results: One hundred thirty-eight patients (mean age 66.5 ± 15.9, 56.5% male) enrolled on the study. The mean IAP was 9.8 ± 3.4. Seventy-nine percent of the patients' PaO2/FiO2 ratio was under 300 mmHg. Figure 1 shows the change in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, PaCO2, PPlato, and MAP of the patients according to the PEEP levels. Overall increases were detected in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P < 0.001) and Pplato (P < 0.001), while PaCO2 and MAP did not change after increasing PEEP gradually. Pairwise analyses revealed differences in PaO2/FiO2 between PEEPzero (186.4 [85.7-265.8]) and PEEPIAP/2 (207.7 [101.7-292.9]) (t = -0.77, P < 0.001), between baseline and PEEPIAP (236.1 [121.4-351.0]) (t = -1.7, P < 0.001), and between PEEPIAP/2 and PEEPIAP (t = -1.0, P < 0.001). Plato pressures were in the safe range (<30 cmH2O) at all three PEEP levels (PEEPzero = 12 [10-15], PEEPIAP/2 = 15 [13-18], PEEPIAP = 17 [14-22]).

Conclusion: In patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and mechanically ventilated, PEEP adjustment according to the IAB improves oxygenation, especially in the settings of the limited source where other PEEP titration methods are absent.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_103_24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

respiratory failure
12
positive end-expiratory
8
end-expiratory pressure
8
intra-abdominal pressure
8
optimizing positive
4
pressure
4
pressure based
4
based intra-abdominal
4
pressure patients
4
patients acute
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!