AI Article Synopsis

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open surgery after SEMS placement in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.
  • The analysis included data from 15 studies with 883 patients and showed that laparoscopic surgery had a significantly lower postoperative complication rate compared to open surgery.
  • However, there were no significant differences in long-term outcomes, such as 3-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates, between the two surgical approaches.

Article Abstract

Background: A bridge to surgery (BTS) after self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a widely recognized treatment strategy for obstructive colorectal cancer. However, there is still a lack of evidence for the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery with those of open surgery following SEMS placement in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

Methods: An electronic literature search through to December 2022 was performed to identify studies comparing short-term and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery following SEMS placement for obstructive colorectal cancer. The main outcome measures were postoperative complication rates and mortality. Secondary outcome measures were the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates. The meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effect or random-effects methods to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results: The meta-analysis included 15 studies and 883 patients, of whom 467 (52.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery and 416 (47.1%) underwent open surgery following SEMS placement. The postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the laparoscopic surgery group than in the open surgery group (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.32-0.67, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 3-year RFS rate or 3-year OS rate between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups (3-year RFS, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.50-1.24, P = 0.30; 3-year OS, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.41-1.12, P = 0.13).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that the short-term outcome was better in patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement than in those who underwent open surgery. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in long-term outcomes between the two groups. Laparoscopic surgery following SEMS placement may be a safe and effective treatment option for obstructive colorectal cancer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458689PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11187-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopic surgery
20
open surgery
20
sems placement
20
obstructive colorectal
16
surgery sems
16
long-term outcomes
12
outcomes laparoscopic
12
colorectal cancer
12
surgery
11
self-expandable metallic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!