A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of topical local anesthetic, topical cooling spray, and audiovisual distraction on relief of needle-related pain during blood collection: A randomized controlled trial. | LitMetric

Background: Venipuncture is one of the most common invasive procedures in healthcare, often resulting in the experience of pain. While audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application have been reported as methods to reduce pain, there is a lack of studies that focus on comparing their efficacy and safety.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pain reduction during venipuncture using audiovisual distraction, topical anesthesia and cold spray application.

Material And Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted at Walailak University (Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand) from April 2023 to July 2023. Eligible adult participants voluntarily enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: group 1 (control), group 2 (topical anesthetic), group 3 (cooling spray), and group 4 (audiovisual distraction). Pain scores and satisfaction levels were assessed following the venipuncture procedure on the upper extremities.

Results: Forty-seven participants were included in the final analysis. The participants had a mean age of 42.3 years (standard deviation (±SD): 13.1), with the majority being female (66.0%). The participants in the intervention groups reported lower pain scores than those in group 1. The mean differences were 2.67 points in group 2 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.49-3.84; p < 0.001), 1.56 points in group 3 (95% CI: 0.15-2.98; p = 0.077), and 1.67 points in group 4 (95% CI: 0.37-2.96; p = 0.042). However, the pain reduction did not reach statistical significance when comparing these 3 interventions. All groups reported a median satisfaction level of 3, with no significant difference among them (H(3) = 6.050, p = 0.109).

Conclusions: Pain reduction interventions, including topical anesthetic, cooling spray and audiovisual distraction, are effective methods for alleviating pain during venipuncture. Participants who received a topical anesthetic reported the lowest pain scores and highest levels of satisfaction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.17219/acem/188106DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

audiovisual distraction
20
cooling spray
12
pain reduction
12
topical anesthetic
12
pain scores
12
points group
12
group 95%
12
pain
10
spray audiovisual
8
randomized controlled
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!