AI Article Synopsis

  • Elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels are primarily influenced by genetics, and this study aimed to explore how these levels relate to other lipid disorders and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors.
  • A cross-sectional analysis of 200 primary-care patients without known CV disease was performed, assessing various risk factors such as age, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, physical inactivity, body mass index (BMI), and specific lipid parameters.
  • Results showed no significant differences in lipid parameters between patients with low (<30 mg/dL) and high (≥30 mg/dL) Lp(a) levels, but the high-Lp(a) group had a higher prevalence of previously diagnosed hyperlipidemia and lower rates of older age and

Article Abstract

: Elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentrations are linked mainly to genetic factors. The relationship between Lp(a) and other lipid disorders or cardiovascular (CV) risk factors has been less investigated. The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of lipid disorders and other CV risk factors according to Lp(a) concentrations. : A cross-sectional analysis of 200 primary-care patients who had not been diagnosed with CV disease was conducted. The following risk factors were assessed: older age, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus or dyslipidemia, smoking, lack of physical activity, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. The following lipid parameters were measured: total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and small, dense LDL (sdLDL-C). Patients were divided into two groups based on their Lp(a) concentrations: <30 mg/dL and ≥30 mg/dL. : In 70% of patients, the Lp(a) concentration was <30 mg/dL. The concentrations of lipid parameters did not differ between the groups. The rate of patients with sdLDL-C >1.0 mmol/L was higher in the low-Lp(a) group (10.0 vs. 1.7%, = 0.04), with no significant differences regarding the other analyzed lipid disorders ( > 0.05). Both in the low- and high-Lp(a) group, most patients had two other abnormal lipid factors (45.0% and 60.0%, respectively). The distribution of impaired lipid parameters ( = 0.41) and other CV risk factors ( = 0.16) was similar in both groups. There was a lower rate of patients >60 years old (15.0% vs. 32.9%, = 0.01) and with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m (46.7% vs. 63.6%, = 0.026) in the high-Lp(a) group, and previously diagnosed hyperlipidemia was more prevalent in this group (65.0% vs. 47.1%, = 0.02). The occurrence of other cardiovascular risk factors did not differ significantly between the Lp(a) groups ( > 0.05). In the high-Lp(a) group, the highest proportion (25.0%) had two CV risk factors, and in the low-Lp(a) group, 31.4% had four CV risk factors. : An elevated Lp(a) concentration is not related to the number of conventional CV risk factors or other impairment major lipid parameters.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11354547PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164649DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk factors
36
lipid disorders
12
cardiovascular risk
12
lipid parameters
12
lipoprotein cholesterol
12
high-lpa group
12
factors
11
risk
9
occurrence lipid
8
disorders cardiovascular
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!