AI Article Synopsis

  • * Proxy responses are often used to address these challenges, but they may not accurately reflect the perspectives of people with IDD.
  • * A study using exploratory graph analysis (EGA) revealed notable differences in response patterns regarding COVID-19 surveys, indicating that responses from people with IDD, proxies, and mixed types diverged more than expected based on demographics.

Article Abstract

Researchers and advocates have long called for improved research methods that better include people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), but challenges to doing so persist. Proxy responses are frequently used to circumvent some of these challenges, but may not fully capture the perspectives of people with IDD. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the possibility of consequences due to a lack of research about health outcomes for people with IDD, with documented disproportionate impact but little understanding about specific experiences for people with IDD. Using exploratory graph analysis (EGA) we explored the use of proxy responses on the COVID-19 Supplement of the National Core Indicators In-Person Survey. Findings suggest significant differences in response patterns between people who answered independently, via proxy, and with a mix of response types beyond what would be expected due to demographic differences in participants.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-129.5.346DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

proxy responses
12
people idd
12
responses covid-19
8
people intellectual
8
intellectual developmental
8
developmental disabilities
8
people
6
proxy
4
covid-19 people
4
disabilities researchers
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!