Impact of Operative Room Noise on Laparoscopic Performance-A Prospective, Randomized Crossover Trial.

J Surg Res

Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address:

Published: October 2024

Introduction: Surgeons are often exposed to different types of operative room (OR) noise, for instance machine alarms, phone calls, and interacting objects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of OR noise on the surgeons' laparoscopic performance.

Methods: A total of 30 laparoscopic novices participated in this single-center, prospective, randomized cross-over trial after completing a standardized laparoscopic training until reaching proficiency. Afterward, all participants performed four different laparoscopic tasks (peg transfer, circle cutting, balloon resection, suture, and knot) twice, once under noise exposure (intervention group), and once without any noise (control group). Primary endpoints were the force exertion and motion analyses. To assess the psychological workload the NASA task load index score was used.

Results: The error rates varied and were significantly different between the noise and the control group. More complex tasks like the circle cutting and suture and knot task revealed higher error rates concerning precision (circle cutting: P < 0.01; suture and knot: P < 0.01). In line with increased error rates in the circle cutting task, increased NASA task load index scores were observed in this task (P = 0.03). However, no significant differences were found in force parameters, such as the maximal force exertion (peg transfer: P = 0.43; circle cutting: P = 0.54; balloon resection: P = 0.64; suture and knot: P = 0.63) and the mean force exertion (peg transfer: P = 0.43; circle cutting: P = 0.54; balloon resection: P = 0.64; suture and knot: P = 0.63) between the groups.

Conclusions: Exposure to normal OR noise led to higher error rates in two of four tasks. This effect could be linked to an increased psychological workload that was present under normal OR noise exposure. However, normal OR noise does not appear to impact surgical novices' laparoscopic task performance regarding applied forces and instrument motion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.110DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

circle cutting
12
operative room
8
room noise
8
prospective randomized
8
suture knot
8
noise control
8
control group
8
error rates
8
noise
6
laparoscopic
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!