New Oncologic Drugs from 2008 to 2023-Differences in Approval and Access between the United States, Europe and Brazil.

Curr Oncol

Centro de Pesquisa Oncológicas-CEPON, Rodovia Admar Gonzada, 655, Florianópolis 88034-000, SC, Brazil.

Published: August 2024

Introduction: Advancements in oncology have revolutionized cancer treatment, with new drugs being approved at different rates worldwide. Our objective was to evaluate the approval of new oncological drugs for solid tumors by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) since 2008.

Methods: Data were collected from public and online databases by searching for the date of submission, the date of the procedure, the date of approval, clinical indication, and drug characteristics. The distribution was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk, test and comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test; the data are reported using median days and interquartile range (IQR1-IQR3).

Results: In total, 104 new oncologic drugs for the treatment of solid tumors were approved by the three agencies: 98 by the FDA, 90 by the EMA, and 68 by ANVISA. The cancer types with the highest number of first indications were lung cancer (n = 24), breast cancer (n = 15), and melanoma (n = 15). Most approvals were for oral medications (n = 63) and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors or other small-molecule inhibitors (n = 54). Time to approval after submission was as follows: the FDA-224 days (167-285); the EMA-364 days (330-418); and ANVISA-403 days (276-636) ( < 0.00001 for the FDA to the EMA and the FDA to ANVISA). The difference between submission dates among the agencies was as follows: EMA-FDA: 24 days (0-85); ANVISA-FDA: 255 (114-632); and ANVISA-EMA: 260 (109-645). The difference in approval dates between the agencies was as follows: EMA-FDA: 185 days (59-319); ANVISA-FDA: 558 (278-957); and ANVISA-EMA: 435 days (158-918).

Conclusions: New oncologic drugs are submitted to the FDA and EMA for approval on similar dates; however, the longer appraisal period by the EMA pushes the approval date for Europe to approximately 6 months later. The same steps at ANVISA delay the approval by 1.5 years. Such procedures cause a significant difference in available medications between these regions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11352723PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080332DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oncologic drugs
12
fda ema
12
approval
8
solid tumors
8
dates agencies
8
agencies ema-fda
8
approval dates
8
days
7
fda
5
ema
5

Similar Publications

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that is usually diagnosed between the ages of 20 and 40. Changes in the immune system also observed in cancer may suggest a higher prevalence of cancer in the MS patient population. In recent years, many highly effective immunosuppressive drugs have been introduced into disease-modifying therapy (DMT) which may be associated with a higher risk of cancer development in patients with MS.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Colon cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating advancements in therapeutic strategies to improve outcomes. Current treatment modalities, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, are limited by systemic toxicity, low drug utilization rates, and off-target effects. Colon-targeted drug delivery systems (CDDS) offer a promising alternative by leveraging the colon's unique physiology, such as near-neutral pH and extended transit time, to achieve localized and controlled drug release.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cancer immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has positively impacted oncological treatments. Despite its effectiveness, immunotherapy is associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that can affect any organ, including the liver. Hepatotoxicity primarily manifests as immune-related hepatitis and, less frequently, cholangitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The growing interest in minimal and non-invasive therapies, especially in the field of cancer treatment, highlights a significant shift toward safer and more effective options. Ablative therapies are well-established tools in cancer treatment, with known effects including locoregional control, while their role as modulators of the systemic immune response against cancer is emerging. The HIFU developed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance enables treatment precision, improves real-time procedural control, and ensures accurate outcome assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has emerged as a transformative modality in the treatment of patients with cancer. However, it is increasingly evident that this therapeutic approach is not without its challenges. The unique nature of CAR-T cells as living drugs introduces a distinct set of side effects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!