Intellectual precocity in children poses unique challenges and opportunities for educational systems. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze intellectual precocity in children until 6 years old, including its definition, manifestations, and various educational programs for intellectually precocious learners. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted. The study included 26 articles published between 2013 and 2023 that provided a conceptualization of precocity or giftedness, and/or focused on characteristics of precocity, and/or investigated educational programs for intellectually precocious children. The authors' conceptualizations of precocity varied, with some providing clear definitions based on a developmental view of precocity, while others merely mentioned the concept. Early indicators of superior traits have been observed in areas such as reading, math, problem-solving, and even in fields that have been traditionally disregarded, such as visual arts. Educational provisions varied widely, including approaches based on enrichment and project-based learning; however, interventions based on socioemotional elements are also highlighted. The findings emphasize the importance of early identification and targeted educational strategies to support the unique needs of intellectually precocious individuals. Future research should focus on longitudinal studies and the development of evidence-based interventions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11355754PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12080076DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intellectual precocity
12
intellectually precocious
12
systematic review
8
early indicators
8
educational provisions
8
precocity children
8
educational programs
8
programs intellectually
8
precocity
7
educational
6

Similar Publications

Intellectual precocity in children poses unique challenges and opportunities for educational systems. This systematic review aims to comprehensively analyze intellectual precocity in children until 6 years old, including its definition, manifestations, and various educational programs for intellectually precocious learners. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[The drawing as a therapeutic mediation tool for gifted children].

Soins Pediatr Pueric

June 2016

Clinique interculturelle, Université Paris 13, 99 avenue Jean-Baptiste-Clément, 93430 Villetaneuse, France.

Intellectual precocity arouses a number of preconceived ideas. While it labels the children concerned as gifted and destined to become exceptional adults, it confines and prescribes and does not guarantee academic success. Based on the hypothesis of the suffering of these children, mediation through drawing is a valuable therapeutic tool.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Two cohorts of intellectually talented 13-year-olds were identified in the 1970s (1972-1974 and 1976-1978) as being in the top 1% of mathematical reasoning ability (1,037 males, 613 females). About four decades later, data on their careers, accomplishments, psychological well-being, families, and life preferences and priorities were collected. Their accomplishments far exceeded base-rate expectations: Across the two cohorts, 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Equally called gifted, supergifted or with high potential, intellectually precocious children are characterised by a fast rhythm of development which is only achieved by 2 to 5% of children. It is only since 2002 that the French National Education System, following the Delaubier report, has recognized their existence and their abilities but also the difficult answer of the education system facing their specific needs. IQ tests remain the basic mean for identifying intellectual precocity but, better than the place determined by the IQ, the analysis of the developmental profile in terms of level or mental age allows a better understanding of each child in his specificity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Learners acquire expertise at different rates and reach different peak performance levels. Key questions arise regarding what patterns of individual differences in expertise development occur and whether innate talent affects such development. International chess is a good test domain for both issues, because it has objective performance measures, actual practice measures (number of games), longitudinal population data, and minimal gatekeeper influence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!