Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study analyzed 22 randomized controlled trials involving 959 participants to determine the impact of resistance training (RT) on body composition, muscle strength, and biomarkers in sarcopenic older adults. Regarding body composition, RT had a small effect size on relative muscle mass (RMM, SMD = 0.25[0.06,0.45]) and absolute muscle mass (AMM, SMD = 0.28[0.06,0.50]) but no effect on reducing body fat percentage (BF%). Meta-regression analysis pinpointed key predictors (p < 0.05): training period, number of sets, contraction speed, and average age. Subgroup analysis revealed that 3 sets over an 8-12 weeks training period, with slower muscle contraction speed at a 60-70 % 1-repetition maximum (1RM) training intensity, produced the most significant effects on reducing BF% and increasing RMM, respectively. Regarding muscle strength, RT had a large effect size on handgrip strength (HS, SMD = 0.83[0.43,1.23]), knee extension strength (KES, SMD = 0.90[0.50,1.30]), but no effect on chair stand test. Meta-regression analysis pinpointed key predictors (p < 0.05): training intensity, number of sets, body mass index, and sample size. Subgroup analysis revealed that the number of sets ≥ 3 and training intensity >70 % 1RM produced the most significant effect of RT on HS. Regarding biomarkers, RT had a medium effect size on insulin-like growth factor-1 (SMD = 0.70[0.10,1.30]), interleukin-10 (SMD = 0.61[0.09,1.13]), follistatin (SMD = 0.56[0.16,0.96]), but no effect on interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and myostatin. It concludes that RT is an effective way to improve muscle strength and the level of synthetic hormones and anti-inflammatory factors in sarcopenic older adults, with a slight impact on body composition and no impact on pro-inflammatory factors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2024.105595 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!