A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Occupational Health: A Systematic Literature Review. | LitMetric

Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Occupational Health: A Systematic Literature Review.

J Occup Environ Med

From the Industrial and Management Systems Engineering, Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia (Z.S.C, A.C.).

Published: December 2024

Objectives: The aims of the study are to identify and to critically analyze studies using artificial intelligence (AI) in occupational health.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science was conducted to identify relevant articles published in English between January 2014-January 2024. Quality was assessed with the validated APPRAISE-AI tool.

Results: The 27 included articles were categorized as follows: health risk assessment ( n = 17), return to work and disability duration ( n = 5), injury severity ( n = 3), and injury management ( n = 2). Forty-seven AI algorithms were utilized, with artificial neural networks, support vector machines, and random forest being most common. Model accuracy ranged from 0.60-0.99 and area under the curve (AUC) from 0.7-1.0. Most studies ( n = 15) were of moderate quality.

Conclusions: While AI has potential clinical utility in occupational health, explainable models that are rigorously validated in real-world settings are warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003212DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

artificial intelligence
8
intelligence occupational
8
occupational health
8
clinical applications
4
applications artificial
4
health systematic
4
systematic literature
4
literature review
4
review objectives
4
objectives aims
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!