AI Article Synopsis

  • Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with immune-mediated pneumonitis (im-PN) being a rare but serious complication that requires prompt diagnosis and management to prevent severe outcomes and allow for continued cancer treatment.
  • A study collected data from 1004 cancer patients treated with ICIs, finding that 24 (2%) developed im-PN, with varying degrees of severity; most patients responded well to steroid treatment, leading to recovery in 21 individuals within an average of 14 weeks.
  • Three main radiologic patterns of im-PN were identified (organizational pneumonia-like, pulmonary eosinophilia, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), and bronchoalve

Article Abstract

Purpose: Treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be associated with a wide spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Among irAEs, immune-mediated pneumonitis (im-PN) is a rare but potentially life-threatening side effect. TPrompt multidisciplinary diagnosis and effective management of im-PN may be essential to avoid severe complications and allowing resumation of therapy.

Patients And Methods: We collected a case series of skin (melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma-CSCC), lung, and mesothelioma cancer patients (pts), treated with ICI at the Center for Immuno-Oncology University Hospital of Siena, Italy, and diagnosed with im-PN. Clinical and radiologic data were thoroughly collected, as well as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples; im-PN was graded using CTCAE v. 5.0. Radiological patterns were reported according to the leischner Society classification.

Results: From January 2014 to February 2023, 1004 patients with melanoma (522), CSCC (42), lung (342) or mesothelioma (98) were treated with ICI (619 monotherapy; 385 combination). Among treated patients, 24 (2%) developed an im-PN and 58% were symptomatic. Im-PN were classified as grades G1 (10) and G2 (14). Prompt steroid treatment led to complete resolution of im-PN in 21 patients, with a median time to resolution of 14 weeks (range: 0.4-51). Twelve patients resumed ICI therapy once fully-recovered and 2 experienced a recurrence that completely resolved with steroids after resumption of treatment. Three radiologic patterns were identified: organizational pneumonia-like (67%), pulmonary eosinophilia (29%), and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (4%). Furthermore, BAL analysis performed in 8 (33%) patients showed an inflammatory lymphocytic infiltrate, predominantly consisting of foam cell-like macrophage infiltrates in 6 cases. Notably, transmission electron microscopy evaluation performed in 2 patients revealed a scenario suggestive of a drug-mediated toxicity.

Conclusion: Im-PN is a rare but challenging side effect of ICI therapy, with variable time of onset and with heterogeneous clinical and radiological presentations. A multidisciplinary assessment is mandatory to optimize the clinical management of im-PN.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346482PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S470892DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

im-pn
9
im-pn rare
8
management im-pn
8
treated ici
8
ici therapy
8
patients
7
multidisciplinary approach
4
approach improve
4
improve management
4
management immune-checkpoint
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), with immune-mediated pneumonitis (im-PN) being a rare but serious complication that requires prompt diagnosis and management to prevent severe outcomes and allow for continued cancer treatment.
  • A study collected data from 1004 cancer patients treated with ICIs, finding that 24 (2%) developed im-PN, with varying degrees of severity; most patients responded well to steroid treatment, leading to recovery in 21 individuals within an average of 14 weeks.
  • Three main radiologic patterns of im-PN were identified (organizational pneumonia-like, pulmonary eosinophilia, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), and bronchoalve
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: We report on the 24-month post-release outcomes of arrestees with opioid use disorder (OUD) enrolled in a randomized trial comparing three treatment approaches initiated in jail.

Methods: Adults (N = 225) receiving medically supervised withdrawal from opioids in the Baltimore Detention Center within a few days of arrest were randomly assigned to: (1) interim methadone treatment plus patient navigation (IM + PN) started in the Detention Center; (2) IM; or (3) Enhanced Treatment-as-Usual (ETAU) consisting of detoxification with methadone and referral to treatment in the community. Participants in both methadone conditions could transfer to standard methadone treatment following release.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are released from pre-trial detention in jail have a high risk of opioid relapse. While several interventions for OUD initiated during incarceration have been studied, few have had an economic evaluation. As part of a three-group randomized trial, we estimated the cost and cost-effectiveness of a negative urine opioid test.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: There are limited data from randomized trials about the impact of starting methadone treatment in jail on subsequent arrest after release for adults with opioid use disorder (OUD).

Methods: Official arrest records were obtained for 212 participants with OUD who were enrolled in a three-group randomized controlled trial of initiating methadone treatment in jail either with or without patient navigation vs. enhanced treatment-as-usual in Baltimore, Maryland.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Methadone treatment of arrestees: A randomized clinical trial.

Drug Alcohol Depend

January 2020

Friends Research Institute, 1040 Park Avenue, Suite 103, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address:

Background: Opioid use disorder is common among detainees in US jails, yet methadone treatment is rarely initiated.

Methods: This is a three-group randomized controlled trial in which 225 detainees in Baltimore treated for opioid withdrawal were assigned to: (1) interim methadone (IM) with patient navigation (IM + PN); (2) IM; or (3) enhanced treatment-as-usual (ETAU). Participants in both IM groups were able to enter standard methadone treatment upon release, while ETAU participants received an assessment/referral number.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!