AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of stereotactic soft-channel and hard-channel aspiration methods in treating primary brainstem hemorrhage in 146 patients.
  • Results showed that patients treated with hard-channel aspiration had a significantly lower mortality rate (14.8%) compared to those treated with soft-channel aspiration (41.5%) after 30 days.
  • The hard-channel group also demonstrated better treatment outcomes at 90 days post-operation, indicating it as a safer and more effective method for addressing primary brainstem hemorrhage.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic soft-channel and hard-channel aspiration in the treatment of primary brainstem hemorrhage.

Methods: The clinical data of 146 patients with primary brainstem hemorrhage at the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University from August 2014 to August 2023 were analyzed. At admission, 146 patients were divided into soft-channel group or hard-channel group using a random number table method. Sixty-five patients were treated with stereotactic soft-channel aspiration, and 81 patients were treated with stereotactic hard-channel aspiration. The amount of residual hematoma was evaluated by head CT immediately after the operation, and the length of the indwelling drainage tube was recorded. Survival status at 30d after the operation and treatment outcome (mRS score and GOS score) at 90d after the operation were also recorded. The amount of residual hematoma immediately after the operation, the length of the indwelling drainage tube after the operation, the mortality rate and the treatment outcome were compared between the two groups.

Results: There was significant difference in the mortality rate 30d after the operation (41.5% vs. 14.8%, χ = 20.192, P = 0.035) between stereotactic soft-channel aspiration and stereotactic hard-channel aspiration for brainstem hemorrhage. The hard-channel group had a higher survival rate. There was significant difference in the treatment outcome at 90 days after treatment (18.5% vs. 32.1%, χ = 4.783, P = 0.047). The hard-channel group showed better treatment outcomes 90 days after surgery.

Conclusion: Stereotactic hard-channel aspiration for primary brainstem hemorrhage has greater clearance efficiency than soft-channel aspiration and can significantly reduce patient mortality and improve treatment outcomes. Stereotactic hard-channel aspiration is a safe and effective method for treating primary brainstem hemorrhage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.107956DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hard-channel aspiration
24
primary brainstem
20
brainstem hemorrhage
20
stereotactic soft-channel
16
stereotactic hard-channel
16
hard-channel group
12
soft-channel aspiration
12
treatment outcome
12
hard-channel
9
aspiration
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!