A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cone-beam CT with a noncircular (sine-on-sphere) orbit: imaging performance of a clinical system for image-guided interventions. | LitMetric

Purpose: We aim to compare the imaging performance of a cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging system with noncircular scan protocols (sine-on-sphere) to a conventional circular orbit.

Approach: A biplane C-arm system (ARTIS Icono; Siemens Healthineers) capable of circular and noncircular CBCT acquisition was used, with the latter orbit (sine-on-sphere, "Sine Spin") executing a sinusoidal motion with tilt amplitude over the half-scan orbit. A test phantom was used for the characterization of image uniformity, noise, noise-power spectrum (NPS), spatial resolution [modulation transfer function (MTF) in axial and oblique directions], and cone-beam artifacts. Findings were interpreted using an anthropomorphic head phantom with respect to pertinent tasks in skull base neurosurgery.

Results: The noncircular scan protocol exhibited several advantages associated with improved 3D sampling-evident in the NPS as filling of the null cone about the spatial frequency axis and reduction of cone-beam artifacts. The region of support at the longitudinal extrema was reduced from 16 to at a radial distance of 6.5 cm. Circular and noncircular orbits exhibited nearly identical image uniformity and quantum noise, demonstrating cupping of and overall noise of . Although both the radially averaged axial MTF ( ) and 45 deg oblique MTF ( ) were lower for the noncircular orbit compared with the circular orbit at the default full reconstruction field of view (FOV), there was no difference in spatial resolution for the medium reconstruction FOV (smaller voxel size). Differences in the perceptual image quality for the anthropomorphic phantom reinforced the objective, quantitative findings, including reduced beam-hardening and cone-beam artifacts about structures of interest in the skull base.

Conclusions: Image quality differences between circular and noncircular CBCT orbits were quantitatively evaluated on a clinical system in the context of neurosurgery. The primary performance advantage for the noncircular orbit was the improved sampling and elimination of cone-beam artifacts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11342057PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.11.4.043503DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cone-beam artifacts
16
circular noncircular
12
imaging performance
8
clinical system
8
noncircular scan
8
noncircular cbct
8
image uniformity
8
spatial resolution
8
noncircular orbit
8
image quality
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!