AI Article Synopsis

  • Scientists are studying how to use special MRI scans to tell the difference between two types of uterine tumors: uterine sarcoma (US) and atypical leiomyoma (ALM).
  • They looked at data from 69 patients with US and 225 with ALM, using different computer methods to analyze the MRI scans.
  • The study found that certain signs, like abnormal bleeding and lab test results, can help predict if someone has US, and the new imaging method showed good accuracy in telling the two tumors apart.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To explore the feasibility of multiparametric MRI-based habitat imaging for distinguishing uterine sarcoma (US) from atypical leiomyoma (ALM).

Methods: This retrospective study included the clinical and preoperative MRI data of 69 patients with US and 225 patients with ALM from three hospitals. At both the individual and cohort levels, the K-means and Gaussian mixture model (GMM) algorithms were utilized to perform habitat imaging on MR images, respectively. Specifically, T2-weighted images (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI) were clustered to generate structural habitats, while apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and CE-T1WI were clustered to create functional habitats. Parameters of each habitat subregion were extracted to construct distinct habitat models. The integrated models were constructed by combining habitat and clinical independent predictors. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: Abnormal vaginal bleeding, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and white blood cell (WBC) counts can serve as clinical independent predictors of US. The GMM-based functional habitat model at the cohort level had the highest mean AUC (0.766) in both the training and validation cohorts, followed by the GMM-based structural habitat model at the cohort level (AUC = 0.760). Within the integrated models, the K-means functional habitat model based on the cohort level achieved the highest mean AUC (0.905) in both the training and validation cohorts.

Conclusion: Habitat imaging based on multiparametric MRI has the potential to distinguish US from ALM. The combination of clinical independent predictors with the habitat models can effectively improve the performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04539-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

habitat imaging
16
clinical independent
12
independent predictors
12
habitat model
12
cohort level
12
habitat
11
multiparametric mri-based
8
mri-based habitat
8
ce-t1wi clustered
8
habitat models
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!