A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Adherence to wearing prescribed footwear in people at risk of diabetes-related foot ulcers. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Wearing prescribed footwear is crucial for preventing diabetes-related foot ulcers, but adherence rates are lower than ideal, with an overall rate of 63%.
  • Adherence is significantly lower at home (59%) compared to outside home environments (74%), while individuals tend to be more active at home (2.2 hours/day).
  • The study found that higher blood sugar levels (Hba1c) and more daily steps were linked to lower footwear adherence, highlighting the need for further research into psychological factors influencing adherence patterns.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Adherence to wearing prescribed footwear is paramount in reducing the risk of developing diabetes-related foot ulcers, but adherence is often lower than optimal. This study aimed to investigate predictors of footwear adherence and variations in adherence and activity in people at risk of diabetes-related foot ulceration.

Methods: Sixty people at high foot ulcer risk were included. We measured the proportion of weight-bearing acitivity time the prescribed footwear was worn for seven days. Multiple linear regression and analysis of variance were used.

Results: Mean overall adherence was 63%. Adherence was lower at home than away from home (59% vs. 74%), while activity was higher at home (2.2 vs. 1.2 h/day). Adherence was similar across activities (61%-63%). No variable predicted the overall adherence. Higher Hba1c predicted lower adherence at home (β = -0.34, p = 0.045, R = 11.6%). More daily steps predicted lower adherence away from home (β = -0.30, p = 0.033, R = 9.3%). Adherence and activity were highest in mornings (71%, 1.1 h) and afternoons (71%, 1.5 h), and lower in evenings (40%, 0.8 h) and at nights (9%, 0.1 h). Adherence was similar on weekdays and weekend days (63% vs. 60%), but activity was higher on weekdays (3.4 vs. 3.0 h).

Conclusion: Adherence levels and predictors thereof differed between adherence at home and away from home, so we suggest to treat them as different concepts. Due to the low explained variance, future studies should focus on other predictors such as psychological variables.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345030PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.70002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adherence
15
prescribed footwear
12
diabetes-related foot
12
adherence wearing
8
wearing prescribed
8
people risk
8
risk diabetes-related
8
foot ulcers
8
adherence lower
8
adherence activity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!