A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The cognitive theory of panic disorder: A systematic narrative review. | LitMetric

The cognitive theory of panic disorder: A systematic narrative review.

Clin Psychol Rev

University of Oxford, Department of Experimental Psychology and The Oxford Institute for Clinical Psychology Training and Research, Isis Education Centre, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK. Electronic address:

Published: November 2024

Background: The cognitive theory of panic disorder proposes that individuals with panic disorder have a relatively enduring tendency to catastrophically misinterpret bodily sensations resulting in panic attacks.

Aims: We investigated whether the evidence is consistent with the theory and its predictions, if updates are required and sought to identify future research considerations.

Methods: We searched Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, EMBASE, MEDLINE and CINAHL (1986 to July 2024). Inclusion criteria were studies collecting quantitative data derived from panic disorder patients, testing one of the predictions and using appropriate outcome measures. Exclusion criteria were non-English language publications, all participants under the age of 18 and studies that were not published in a peer-reviewed journal. Quality was assessed using 'QualSyst' and synthesis was based on each prediction tested. PROPSERO registration #CRD42022332211.

Results: 53 studies were identified amongst 49 publications. There was substantial evidence for all predictions. Three studies did not support the prediction tested and none were inconsistent.

Limitations: Most studies were 'medium' in quality and were predominately from female samples.

Conclusions: Findings are consistent with the theory and its predictions. Higher quality research is needed and implications for future research are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102483DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

panic disorder
16
cognitive theory
8
theory panic
8
consistent theory
8
theory predictions
8
prediction tested
8
panic
5
studies
5
disorder
4
disorder systematic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!