Radiographers' perspectives on immobilisation and restraint mechanisms in paediatric radiography.

J Med Imaging Radiat Sci

Discipline of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Ireland; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Radiology, Kolding, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospitals of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.

Published: December 2024

Introduction: The utilisation of immobilisation or restraint during paediatric radiography is a multifactorial issue with associated legal and ethical considerations. Current practice regularly presents challenges for radiographers, with a notable absence of any professional best-practice guidance. This study investigated radiographers' perspectives in Ireland on the use of immobilisation or restraint methods and the factors influencing these choices and aimed to fill the 20-year gap in European radiographers' perspectives gaining an up-to-date understanding and contribute to the global conversation in this regard.

Methods: An anonymous online survey design was constructed using the Google Forms platform and distributed to hospital radiology departments across the Southern region of Ireland. Additionally, a short survey was send to the head of the nine radiology departments to audit the existing availability of immobilisation and/or restraint devices for paediatric radiography. Descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages) were undertaken. Bar charts were utilised where appropriate to display trends.

Results: One hundered and three responses were received. The majority of radiographers reported using immobilisation (95 %) or restraint (89 %) techniques during paediatric radiography, although 70 % acknowledged the lack of training regarding restraint techniques. However, 93 % reported trying alternative techniques such as distraction and negotiation to avoid immobilisation or restraint. A desire for further guidance and training was reported, with 80 % of respondents noting training as essential or potentially beneficial.

Conclusions: Ambiguity remains surrounding the distinction between the terms "restraint" and "immobilisation" in paediatric radiography. Radiographers' use of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography is influenced by the child's age, distress level, radiation protection and safety, and the ability of the child to understand instructions. Appropriate up-to-date guidelines and training would be recommended to clarify terminology and promote the safe practice of restraint and immobilisation during paediatric radiography.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101738DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

paediatric radiography
28
immobilisation restraint
20
radiographers' perspectives
12
restraint
9
immobilisation
8
radiology departments
8
restraint techniques
8
restraint immobilisation
8
immobilisation paediatric
8
paediatric
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!