A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Kinetic Profiling of Mutations With Circulating Tumor DNA in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group CO.26 Trial Suggests the Loss of Mutations in Neo--Wildtype Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Is Transient. | LitMetric

Purpose: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), mutations drive resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies. It is unclear whether mutations ever become clonally undetectable.

Methods: CO.26 was a phase II clinical trial that assessed durvalumab + tremelimumab in heavily pretreated mCRC. mutation status was tracked over time using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing at baseline, week 8, and on progression.

Results: Among the 95 patients with mutations in their archival tumor tissue, 6.3% (6/95) had undetectable mutations in ctDNA collected at baseline or week 8 of the CO.26 study. Of these, 67% (4/6) of disappearances were transient, with the same mutation reappearing with progressive disease. In three cases, the simultaneous persistence of other preexisting CRC-associated truncal mutations could not be demonstrated, suggestive of low tumor shedding of ctDNA, leaving the incidence of true clonal reversion to -wildtype (WT) possibly as low as 3.2% (3/95). Fewer patients in the neo--WT group (33%) had greater than four lesions at trial baseline compared with patients with persistent mutations (75%), = .046. The likelihood of synchronous metastases at cancer diagnosis (33% 63%; = .15) or liver metastases at trial baseline (50% 68.5%; = .17) was not significantly different between patients with disappearing versus persistent mutations. Overall survival from stage IV diagnosis (hazard ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.35 to 1.72]; = .52) was not significantly different between those with disappearing versus persistent mutations. The disappearance of mutations was not associated with primary tumor sidedness ( = .41), archival -mutant status ( = .16/1.00/.09), nor baseline ctDNA amplifications ( = 1.00).

Conclusion: We identified a 3.2%-6.3% prevalence of the neo--WT phenomenon in the CO.26 trial. However, 67% of apparent cases were transient with subsequent re-emergence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371075PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00031DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

persistent mutations
12
mutations
11
circulating tumor
8
tumor dna
8
co26 trial
8
metastatic colorectal
8
colorectal cancer
8
baseline week
8
trial baseline
8
disappearing versus
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!