AI Article Synopsis

  • Hepatic steatosis (HS) eligibility criteria for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) should focus on large droplet fat, as recommended by the Banff consensus, and the study aimed to find MRI PDFF cut-offs for HS assessment in potential donors.
  • The retrospective study analyzed potential LDLT donors who underwent MRI and liver biopsy, identifying dual PDFF cut-offs for diagnosing various levels of histologic HS, achieving high sensitivity and specificity in both development and validation datasets.
  • The study found that for diagnosing histologic HS ≥30%—the common threshold for LDLT donor eligibility—the PDFF cut-offs achieved both sensitivities and specificities over 90%, and a formula was created for estimating histologic HS based on

Article Abstract

Hepatic steatosis (HS) criteria for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) donor eligibility should be based on large droplet fat as per Banff consensus recommendations. We aimed to establish magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction cutoffs for HS assessment in potential LDLT donors. This retrospective study included consecutive potential LDLT donors who underwent MRI and liver biopsy between 2013 and 2023 at 2 tertiary institutions, each as development (n = 3062; 2015 men; median [IQR] age of 32 [25-38] y) and external validation (n = 472; 287 men; 35 [26-44] y) data sets. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was measured using dedicated MRI sequences. Histologic HS, defined as a large droplet fat fraction, was used as the reference standard. Dual PDFF cutoffs aimed at 95% sensitivity or 95% specificity, for diagnosing histologic HS of ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30%, and ≥40%, were determined in the development data set using 10-fold cross-validation. The cutoffs were then validated in the external validation data set. The equation for estimating histologic HS from PDFF was also derived using linear regression. The PDFF cutoffs for histologic HS of ≥10%, ≥20%, ≥30%, and ≥40%, targeting 95% sensitivity, were 3.7%, 5.5%, 8.0%, and 10.0%, respectively. External validation demonstrated high sensitivities ≥97.9% with specificities ranging from 60.9% to 95.1%. The PDFF cutoffs targeting 95% specificity were 6.3%, 8.0%, 9.1%, and 10.1%, respectively. External validation rendered high specificities ranging from 88.5% to 95.3%, with sensitivities ranging from 76.6% to 100%. For diagnosing histologic HS ≥30%, which is the most prevalently used threshold for LDLT donor eligibility assessment, the PDFF cutoffs achieved sensitivities and specificities of over 90%. The equation of (Histologic HS = -2.95 + 1.93 × PDFF) was derived.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/LVT.0000000000000467DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

external validation
16
pdff cutoffs
16
donor eligibility
12
fat fraction
12
eligibility assessment
8
ldlt donor
8
large droplet
8
droplet fat
8
proton density
8
density fat
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!