Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Advances in general-purpose computers have enabled the generation of high-quality synthetic medical images that human eyes cannot differ between real and AI-generated images. To analyse the efficacy of the generated medical images, this study proposed a modified VGG16-based algorithm to recognise AI-generated medical images. Initially, 10,000 synthetic medical skin lesion images were generated using a Generative Adversarial Network (GAN), providing a set of images for comparison to real images. Then, an enhanced VGG16-based algorithm has been developed to classify real images vs AI-generated images. Following hyperparameters tuning and training, the optimal approach can classify the images with 99.82% accuracy. Multiple other evaluations have been used to evaluate the efficacy of the proposed network. The complete dataset used in this study is available online to the research community for future research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240612 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!