There seems to be an incessant debate regarding the duration of dependency of free flaps on pedicle vessels and the extent to which neovascularization from surrounding tissue contributes to the fortification of the free flaps. Although animal studies have suggested that pedicle vessels can be safely divided 5-8 days postoperatively without flap failure in fasciocutaneous flaps, recent clinical reports, particularly concerning the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, cast doubt on this assumption. This report highlights a singular case of delayed-onset total necrosis in a DIEP flap following a contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) scan conducted 48 days post reconstructive surgery. The patient, a 56-year-old woman, had undergone a mastectomy for right breast cancer followed by immediate tissue expander placement. Subsequently, 6 months later, she underwent delayed reconstructive surgery with a DIEP flap. The postoperative course was uneventful, except that she had a CECT scan as part of follow-up care 48 days postoperatively and developed an abrupt yellow exudate from the right breast wound 2 days later, eventually leading to aggressive debridement of the totally necrotized flap 60 days postoperatively. This case marks the first instance of late-onset total necrosis of a DIEP flap following a CECT. The intensified endothelial damage induced by contrast media, in the context of the high dependency of the DIEP flap on the pedicle vessels with marginal blood supply from the surrounding wound bed, could be ascribed as the cause of this total loss of the flap.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11340928 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006086 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
January 2025
My Houston Surgeons, 9230 Katy Freeway, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77055, USA.
Removal of the rib and adjacent cartilage is a common step for exposure of the recipient chest vessels in free-flap breast reconstructions. However, this adds both short- and long-term morbidity to the procedure. We describe our experience in avoiding rib removal in microvascular breast reconstruction.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
January 2025
Division of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81377 Munich, Germany.
The autologous reconstruction of the female breast using a microsurgical DIEP flap is a reliable and safe method. To detect impairments early and preserve the microvascular flap through timely revision, a better understanding of physiologic perfusion dynamics is necessary. This exploratory study examines changes in microcirculation in free DIEP flaps within the first 72 h after vascular anastomosis using laser Doppler flowmetry and white-light spectrophotometry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJPRAS Open
March 2025
Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, USA.
Breast revision surgery is often necessary in patients following postmastectomy breast reconstruction with free autologous flaps for aesthetic improvement. Indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy continue to be expanded oncologically. However, revision techniques for aesthetic concerns following breast reconstruction are underreported in the literature.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPlast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
January 2025
Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Background: Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap has become the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. Flap take-back to the operating room (OR) is an uncommon but difficult situation, requiring prompt and accessible resources. We conducted a literature review and independent expert review to inform evidence-based perioperative algorithms in the event of DIEP flap compromise.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
January 2025
Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Introduction: Despite its therapeutic advantages, postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) increases the risk of complications and often leads to poor cosmesis in women undergoing breast reconstruction. Preoperative radiotherapy followed by skin-sparing mastectomy and deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is technically feasible, with low rates of surgical complications and good short-term oncological outcomes. Further evaluation in a randomised trial comparing preoperative radiotherapy versus conventional PMRT in breast reconstruction is required to assess both oncological and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!