AI Article Synopsis

  • This study explored masseter muscle characteristics in patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) using ultrasonography and shear wave elastography, focusing on thickness and hardness.
  • It included 51 participants aged 5-20 years and measured the masseter muscles on both affected and unaffected sides, revealing significant differences in size and stiffness.
  • The findings contribute to understanding HFM’s impact on muscle characteristics, which can aid in diagnosis, treatment decisions, and prognosis based on severity levels.

Article Abstract

Background: This study aimed to prospectively investigate the reference values for masseter muscle thickness and hardness using ultrasonography and shear wave elastography, respectively, in patients with hemifacial microsomia (HFM).

Methods: We enrolled 51 patients, aged 5-20 years, with HFM including 31 males and 20 females. The upper-lower, left-right, and anterior-posterior diameters of 102 masseter muscles and stiffness of 98 masseter muscles were determined by examining the unaffected and affected sides of each participant's face.

Results: The upper-lower, left-right, and anterior-posterior diameters of the masseter muscle were significantly smaller at rest (4.26 ± 0.83, 2.94 ± 0.75, and- 0.80 ± 0.25 cm, respectively) and during contraction (3.95 ± 0.78, 2.71 ± 0.78, and 0.87 ± 0.29 cm, respectively) in the affected side than those in the healthy side (5.45 ± 0.66, 3.87 ± 0.49, and 0.97 ± 0.20 cm, respectively, at rest and 4.99 ± 0.45, 3.49 ± 0.53, and 1.07 ± 0.23 cm, respectively, during contraction, p < 0.05). In the resting state, the hardness of the masseter muscle on the affected side (0.77 ± 0.66 m/s) was significantly greater than that on the healthy side (0.42 ± 0.41 m/s; p < 0.05). The magnitude of changes in the upper-lower, left-right, and anterior-posterior diameters of the biting muscle in the occlusal state were significantly smaller on the affected side (-0.30 ± 0.27, -0.23 ± 0.17, and 0.08 ± 0.08 cm, respectively) than those in the healthy side (-0.47 ± 0.38, -0.37 ± 0.25, and 0.10 ± 0.12 cm, respectively, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The knowledge of these values allows for better understanding of the disease characteristics of HFM, which may be used for its diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Patients experiencing different severity levels exhibited significant differences in the morphology and function of the masseter muscle on the affected-side (p < 0.05).

Evidence Level: Level III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

masseter muscle
12
patients hemifacial
8
hemifacial microsomia
8
shear wave
8
wave elastography
8
upper-lower left-right
8
left-right anterior-posterior
8
anterior-posterior diameters
8
masseter muscles
8
examination masseter
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!