Objective: To determine whether mortality differed between initial invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) followed by delayed IMV in immunocompromised patients with sepsis.

Design: Retrospective analysis using the National Data Center for Medical Service claims data in China from 2017 to 2019.

Setting: A total of 3530 hospitals across China.

Patients: A total of 36,187 adult immunocompromised patients with sepsis requiring ventilation.

Interventions: None.

Measurements And Main Results: The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Patients were categorized into NIV initiation or IMV initiation groups based on first ventilation. NIV patients were further divided by time to IMV transition: no transition, immediate (≤ 1 d), early (2-3 d), delayed (4-7 d), or late (≥ 8 d). Mortality was compared between groups using weighted Cox models. Over the median 9-day follow-up, mortality was similar for initial NIV versus IMV (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.006; 95% CI, 0.959-1.055). However, among NIV patients, a longer time to IMV transition is associated with stepwise increases in mortality, from immediate transition (HR 1.65) to late transition (HR 2.51), compared with initial IMV. This dose-response relationship persisted across subgroups and sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions: Prolonged NIV trial before delayed IMV transition is associated with higher mortality in immunocompromised sepsis patients ultimately intubated.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006400DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

immunocompromised patients
12
imv transition
12
invasive mechanical
8
mechanical ventilation
8
hospital mortality
8
mortality immunocompromised
8
patients sepsis
8
imv
8
ventilation niv
8
delayed imv
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!