AI Article Synopsis

  • A study analyzed over 12,000 patients admitted for aspiration at 28 Canadian hospitals from 2015 to 2022 to see how inserting a long-term enteral feeding tube affects in-hospital mortality.
  • Of those studied, 6.6% received a long-term enteral feeding tube; results showed similar in-hospital mortality rates between those with and without the tube, but those with the tube took longer to be discharged alive.
  • Additionally, patients with an enteral feeding tube were found to have a higher risk of being readmitted for aspiration within 90 days of discharge.

Article Abstract

Background: We aimed to describe the association between insertion of a new long-term enteral feeding tube during admission for aspiration and in-hospital mortality.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study across 28 Canadian hospitals from 2015 to 2022 included consecutive patients who were admitted for aspiration. Patients were categorized based on new long-term enteral feeding tube insertion during hospital stay or not. The primary outcome was the time to death in hospital. Secondary outcomes included time to discharge alive and hospital readmission for aspiration within 90 days. We used propensity score weighting to balance covariates, and a competing risk model to describe in-hospital death and discharge.

Results: Of 12,850 patients admitted for aspiration, 852 (6.6%) patients received a long-term enteral feeding tube. In the hospital, 184 (21.6%) and 2489 (20.8%) patients in the enteral feeding tube group and no enteral feeding tube group died, respectively. Within 90 days of discharge, 127 (14.9%) and 1148 (9.6%) patients in the enteral feeding tube and no enteral feeding tube group were readmitted for aspiration, respectively. After balancing covariates, an enteral feeding tube was associated with a similar in-hospital mortality risk (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.89-1.23; P = 0.5800), longer time to discharge alive (sHR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.54-0.63; P < 0.0001), and a higher risk of readmission (risk difference = 5.0%, 95% CI = 2.4%-7.6%; P = 0.0001).

Conclusion: Initiation of long-term enteral tube feeding was not uncommon after admission for aspiration and was not associated with an improvement in the probability of being discharged alive from the hospital or readmitted for aspiration.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jpen.2680DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

enteral feeding
36
feeding tube
36
long-term enteral
16
tube group
12
enteral
9
feeding
9
tube
9
association insertion
8
insertion long-term
8
retrospective cohort
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!