Intramedullary versus locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures: indications and technical considerations.

Background: The incidence of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) continues to increase with an aging population, and intramedullary nailing (IMN) and locking plate fixation are two commonly employed techniques for the surgical management of PHF. However, the optimal fixation method can be a source of ongoing controversy. Some influencing factors include the extent of humeral head involvement, fracture complexity, patient age, and surgeon preference. There are many studies that provide a mix of data either when comparing the two techniques or analyzing them in isolation. The aim of this review is to further elucidate the indications and technical considerations involved specifically in IMN vs. locking plate fixation for PHF to further aid orthopedic surgeons when choosing surgical management.

Methods: A narrative approach was chosen for this review allowing for a comprehensive review of literature, including recent findings pertaining to the comparison of management options for PHF. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria involved studies that discussed "proximal humerus fracture" and either "intramedullary nail" or "locking plate fixation."

Results: Complications such as avascular necrosis, hardware failure, additional surgical interventions, infection, fracture redisplacement, rotator cuff rupture, and nonunion did not show significant differences between the two groups. Newer generation humeral nails have minimized early complications. As both techniques undergo further refinement and utilization when specifically indicated, functional outcomes, potential complications, and postoperative pain continue to be improved.

Conclusion: The available evidence suggests that both intramedullary nails and locking plates can effectively restore shoulder function in the treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures, with unclear superiority of either method. The choice of technique should be tailored to patient factors such as fracture type, age, bone quality, and functional expectations. Surgeon experience also plays a role. While certain presentations may exhibit trends that favor one fixation, no specific technique can be universally recommended. Both IMN and LP have shown comparable and satisfactory outcomes, and the final fixation method chosen should take into account the unique characteristics of each patient.