Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Alga 1.0, a product containing bromoform, was fed to cattle to evaluate its effects on methane ( ) and carbon dioxide ( ) emissions and diet digestibility. Twelve nonlactating, nonpregnant Jersey cows (490 ± 19 kg body weight) were used in four replicated 3 × 3 Latin squares with three periods, each consisting of 21 d. Cows were blocked by feed intake (averaged intakes over 4 wk prior to trial) and assigned randomly to one of three treatments. Treatments included Alga 1.0 fed at 0, 69, and 103 g/d in a 0.454 kg/d dry matter () top-dress daily in a modified distillers grains plus solubles () carrier. Diet consisted of 60% dry-rolled corn, 20% corn silage, 15% modified distillers grains, and 5% supplement (DM basis). Headbox-style indirect calorimeters were utilized to evaluate gas production from individual cows with two nonconsecutive 23-h collections in each period. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure of SAS with cow within square as experimental unit and as a random effect, and treatment and period as fixed effects. Linear and quadratic contrasts were used to compare treatments. Feeding Alga 1.0 linearly reduced dry matter intake (, < 0.01) by 10.1% for 69 g/d inclusion and 13.3% for 103 g/d inclusion compared to the control. Nutrient intakes decreased linearly ( < 0.01) due to lower DMI, but nutrient digestibility was not impacted ( ≥ 0.28). Inclusion of Alga 1.0 did not impact gross energy or digestible energy concentration of the diets expressed as Mcal/kg DM ( ≥ 0.22) but did linearly reduce energy intake (Mcal/d; < 0.01). Feeding Alga 1.0 linearly reduced enteric CH emissions measured as g/kg DMI ( < 0.01) by 39 and 64% for 69 g/d and 103 g/d inclusion, respectively. Linear reductions ( < 0.01) of 64% to 65% were also observed in enteric CH emissions when expressed per kilogram of DM or organic matter digested. Respired CO as g/d linearly decreased ( = 0.03) for cattle fed Alga 1.0 but did not differ when expressed as g/kg of DMI ( ≥ 0.23). Oxygen consumption did not differ between treatments for g/d and g/kg DMI (≥ 0.19). In conclusion, feeding Alga 1.0 reduced DMI up to 13.3%, did not impact digestibility, and significantly reduced CH emissions up to 63%.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329799 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae109 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!