Does Secondary Mechanical Manipulation of Lipoaspirate Enhance the Vasculogenic Potential of Fat Grafts? A Systematic Review.

Ann Plast Surg

From the Blond McIndoe Laboratories, Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.

Published: September 2024

Background: Fat grafting is a highly versatile option in the reconstructive armamentarium but with unpredictable retention rates and outcomes. The primary outcome of this systematic review was to assess whether secondary mechanically processed lipoaspirate favorably enhances the vasculogenic potential of fat grafts when compared to unprocessed lipoaspirate or fat grafts prepared using centrifugation alone. The secondary outcome was to assess the evidence around graft retention and improved outcomes when comparing the aforementioned groups.

Methods: A search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted up to February 2022. All human and animal research, which provided a cross-comparison between unprocessed, centrifuged, secondary mechanically fragmented (SMF) or secondary mechanically disrupted (SMD) fat grafts, was included.

Results: Thirty-one full texts were included. Vasculogenic potential was assessed by quantification of angiogenic growth factors and cellular composition. Cellular composition of mesenchymal stem cells, perivascular stem cells, and endothelial progenitor cells was quantified by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Fat graft volume retention rates and fat grafting to aid wound healing were assessed. Although the presence of industry-funded studies and inadequate reporting of methodological data in some studies were sources of bias, data showed SMF grafts contain an enriched pericyte population with increased vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secretion. Animal studies indicate that SMD grafts may increase rates of fat graft retention and wound closure compared to centrifuged grafts; however, clinical studies are yet to show similar results.

Conclusions: In this systematic review, we were able to conclude that the existing literature suggests mechanically processing fat, whether it be through fragmentation or disruption, improves vasculogenic potential by enhancing angiogenic growth factor and relevant vascular progenitor cell levels. Whilst in vivo animal studies are scarce, the review findings suggest that secondary mechanically processed fat enhances fat graft retention and can aid with wound healing. Further clinical studies are required to assess potential differences in human studies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004048DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vasculogenic potential
16
secondary mechanically
16
systematic review
12
fat grafts
12
graft retention
12
fat graft
12
fat
11
potential fat
8
fat grafting
8
retention rates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!