AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Background: Transanal total mesorectal excision has emerged as a potential solution to certain limitations associated with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients. Differences in surgical approaches have raised questions regarding their impact on the risk of postoperative urinary retention, with limited data available from large scale randomized clinical study.

Objective: To report incidence of postoperative urinary retention and evaluate the associated risk factors for transanal total mesorectal excision.

Design: In this randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials. gov NCT06147492), we retrieved 524 patients who received total mesorectal excision (TME) for stage I-III rectal cancer between June 2019 and April 2022, and the patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either taTME or laTME.

Patients: We enrolled 524 patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for stage I-III rectal cancer between June 2019 and April 2022.

Main Outcome Measures: The incidence of postoperative urinary retention.

Results: Among the 524 enrolled patients, 261 were randomized to the laTME group, while 263 were were randomized the taTME group. The median age was 58 years, and 340 participants (64.8 %) were male. Notably, 37 individuals (7.0 %) experienced postoperative urinary retention during the follow-up period, with no significant disparity was observed between the taTME and laTME groups (6.8 % and 7.2 %, respectively,  = 0.98). Risk factors associated with PUR in patients following taTME encompassed early removal of the urinary catheter ( = 0.006), net infusion rate >4.09 ml kg.h ( = 0.006), and an age surpassing 65 years ( = 0.0321).

Limitations: The generalizability of the findings outside specialist rectal cancer centers may be limited

Conclusions: Transanal total mesorectal excision was not found to heighten the risk of postoperative urinary retention. Nonetheless, it is advisable removing postoperative catheter beyond the initial day and exercising caution in the administration of intravenous fluids in clinical practice for taTME procedures.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11325049PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34753DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

total mesorectal
28
postoperative urinary
24
mesorectal excision
24
urinary retention
20
rectal cancer
20
transanal total
12
laparoscopic total
8
excision rectal
8
risk postoperative
8
incidence postoperative
8

Similar Publications

Background: The modern approach to treating rectal cancer, which involves total mesorectal excision directed by imaging assessments, has significantly enhanced patient outcomes. However, locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) continues to be a significant clinical issue. Identifying LRRC through imaging is complex, due to the mismatch between fibrosis and inflammatory pelvic tissue.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate current MRI-based criteria for malignancy in mesorectal nodal structures in rectal cancer.

Method: Mesorectal nodal structures identified on baseline MRI as lymph nodes were anatomically compared to their corresponding structures histopathologically, reported as lymph nodes, tumour deposits or extramural venous invasion. All anatomically matched nodal structures from patients with primary surgery and all malignant nodal structures from patients with neoadjuvant treatment were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision (TME) is a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs) are often inadequately treated with standard regimens. This study examines the treatment and postoperative outcomes in LARC patients receiving a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for LPLNs during long-course chemoradiotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The watch-and-wait strategy provides an opportunity to pursue non-operative management in rectal cancer patients with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. The management of those with near complete response remains controversial.

Objective: We assessed the oncologic outcomes of patients managed by watch-and-wait versus total mesorectal excision according to clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Low anterior resection (LAR) is the gold standard for curative cancer treatment in the middle and upper rectum. In radically operated patients, the local recurrence rates with total mesorectal excision (TME) after 5 and 10 years was<10%, with 80% in 5 years survival. Anastomotic leakage (AL) affects 4%-20% of patients who underwent LAR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!