AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to determine if a new transformer model could better classify sleep stages using 8-hour polysomnography data compared to existing AI methods.
  • Researchers trained a transformer model (PFTSleep) on extensive sleep signal data, which included various physiological metrics, and validated it with two large datasets from different studies.
  • Results showed that the new model performed well with high accuracy in identifying sleep stages, particularly in sensitivity and specific sleep classifications, proving effective in using all available data channels over longer periods.

Article Abstract

Study Objectives: To investigate whether a foundational transformer model using 8-hour, multichannel data from polysomnograms can outperform existing artificial intelligence (AI) methods for sleep stage classification.

Methods: We utilized the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) visits 1 and 2 for training and validation and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) for testing of our model. We trained a self-supervised foundational transformer (called PFTSleep) that encodes 8-hour long sleep studies at 125 Hz with 7 signals including brain, movement, cardiac, oxygen, and respiratory channels. These encodings are used as input for training of an additional model to classify sleep stages, without adjusting the weights of the foundational transformer. We compared our results to existing AI methods that did not utilize 8-hour data or the full set of signals but did report evaluation metrics for the SHHS dataset.

Results: We trained and validated a model with 8,444 sleep studies with 7 signals including brain, movement, cardiac, oxygen, and respiratory channels and tested on an additional 2,055 studies. In total, we trained and tested 587,944 hours of sleep study signal data. Area under the precision recall curve (AUPRC) scores were 0.82, 0.40, 0.53, 0.75, and 0.82 and area under the receiving operating characteristics curve (AUROC) scores were 0.99, 0.95, 0.96, 0.98, and 0.99 for wake, N1, N2, N3, and REM, respectively, on the SHHS validation set. For MESA, the AUPRC scores were 0.56, 0.16, 0.40, 0.45, and 0.65 and AUROC scores were 0.94, 0.77, 0.87, 0.91, and 0.96, respectively. Our model was compared to the longest context window state-of-the-art model and showed increases in macro evaluation scores, notably sensitivity (3.7% increase) and multi-class REM (3.39% increase) and wake (0.97% increase) F1 scores.

Conclusions: Utilizing full night, multi-channel PSG data encodings derived from a foundational transformer improve sleep stage classification over existing methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326349PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.02.24311417DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

foundational transformer
20
sleep
9
full night
8
sleep study
8
sleep stages
8
sleep stage
8
sleep studies
8
signals including
8
including brain
8
brain movement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!