COMPARISON OF LIGAMENT Z-PLASTY AND CONVENTIONAL SURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL.

Background: Conventional surgery performed to treat carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is associated with complications such as pillar pain or loss of strength. This study aimed to compare the incidence of pillar pain between two techniques at the 3-week and 6-month follow-up and to determine any differences in the recovery of grip strength (GS), pinch strength (PS), and Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores.

Methods: This randomized clinical trial comprised 109 patients of which 55 underwent ligament Z-plasty and 54 underwent conventional surgery (longitudinal section of the transverse carpal ligament without posterior closure). The GS, PS, presence of pillar pain, and BCTQ scores were assessed preoperatively and after 3 weeks and 6 months.

Results: The incidence of pillar pain after 3 weeks was lower in patients undergoing Z-plasty than in those undergoing conventional surgery (25.5% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.04). Moreover, the absolute change in the PS after 3 weeks (p = 0.01) and GS after 6 months (p = 0.05) and the absolute and relative changes in the PS after 6 months (p = 0.008 and p = 0.01, respectively) were significantly higher in the Z-plasty group than in the conventional surgery group.

Conclusions: Z-plasty is a valid surgical procedure for treating CTS. It is associated with a lower incidence of pillar pain and better recovery of postoperative strength compared to the conventional surgical technique, with both techniques showing similar results in CTS recovery.