A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Retrograde Nail-Washer Combination Versus Lateral Locked Plating for Distal Femur Fractures. | LitMetric

Objectives: The objective of this study was to report outcomes of the Retrograde Femoral Nail-Advanced with Lateral Attachment Washer (RFNA-LAW) (Synthes, Paoli, PA) compared with laterally locked plates (LLP) when treating AO/OTA type 33 distal femoral fractures.

Design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Single, academic, Level-1 Trauma Center.

Patient Selection Criteria: All adult patients who had fixation of an AO/OTA type 33 distal femoral fracture with the RFNA-LAW combination or LLP from 2018 to 2023 with follow-up to union or a minimum of 1 year.

Outcome Measures And Comparisons: The main outcome measure was union. Secondary outcomes included implant failure, infection, and alignment immediately postoperatively and at final follow-up. Primary and secondary outcome measures were compared between the RFNA-LAW and LLP groups.

Results: Forty-eight patients (19 female) with a mean age of 56 years (range 19-94 years) were in the RFNA-LAW group. Fifty-three patients (29 female) with a mean age of 66 years (24-91 years) were in the LLP group. There were no significant differences when comparing body mass index, diabetes, smoking status, mechanism of injury, or fracture classification between groups ( P > 0.05). There was no difference in immediate, postoperative alignment ( P = 0.49). When comparing anatomic lateral distal femoral angle measurements at final follow-up, there was significantly more malalignment in the LLP group ( P = 0.005). There were 8 implant failures (15%) in the LLP group compared with 1 in the RFNA-LAW group (2%) ( P = 0.02). There were 14 reoperations (26%) in the LLP group compared with 4 (8%) in the RFNA-LAW group ( P = 0.02).

Conclusions: The Retrograde Nail Advanced-Lateral Attachment Washer combination demonstrated a high union rate when treating complex fractures of the distal femur. When compared with lateral locked plating, this implant combination demonstrated significantly lower rates of nonunion and reoperation.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002899DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

llp group
16
distal femoral
12
compared rfna-law
12
rfna-law group
12
lateral locked
8
locked plating
8
distal femur
8
attachment washer
8
ao/ota type
8
type distal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!