This commentary is on the systematic review by Lee et al. on pages 49–58 of this issue.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625461 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.16052 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Eye posture and screen alignment with simulated see-through head-mounted displays.
J Vis
January 2025
Magic Leap Switzerland GmbH, Zürich, Switzerland.
When rendering the visual scene for near-eye head-mounted displays, accurate knowledge of the geometry of the displays, scene objects, and eyes is required for the correct generation of the binocular images. Despite possible design and calibration efforts, these quantities are subject to positional and measurement errors, resulting in some misalignment of the images projected to each eye. Previous research investigated the effects in virtual reality (VR) setups that triggered such symptoms as eye strain and nausea.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSurgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
EClinicalMedicine
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery and Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre and Cochrane China Centre and MAGIC China Centre and IDEAL China Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Background: Surgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) include conventional craniotomy (CC), decompressive craniectomy (DC), and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with the latter encompassing endoscopic surgery (ES) and minimally invasive puncture surgery (MIPS). However, the superiority of surgery over conservative medical treatment (CMT) and the comparative benefits of different surgical procedures remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various surgical interventions for treating ICH.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFApproaches to Reach Trustworthy Patient Education: A Narrative Review.
Healthcare (Basel)
November 2024
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, MAGIC China Centre, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Background: Patient education is a cornerstone of modern healthcare. Health literacy improves health-related quality of life and health outcomes of patients, enhanced by effective patient education. Inadequate competency of patient education in healthcare providers triggered this review to summarize common approaches and recent advancements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInternational consensus statement on microbiome testing in clinical practice.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol
February 2025
Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, UOC Gastroenterologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy. Electronic address:
There is growing interest in the potential exploitation of the gut microbiome as a diagnostic tool in medicine, but evidence supporting its clinical usefulness is scarce. An increasing number of commercial providers offer direct-to-consumer microbiome diagnostic tests without any consensus on their regulation or any proven value in clinical practice, which could result in considerable waste of individual and health-care resources and potential drawbacks in the clinical management of patients. We convened an international multidisciplinary expert panel to standardise best practices of microbiome testing for clinical implementation, including recommendations on general principles and minimum requirements for their provision, indications, pre-testing protocols, method of analyses, reporting of results, and potential clinical value.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntegration of non-randomized studies with randomized controlled trials in meta-analyses of clinical studies: a meta-epidemiological study on effect estimation of interventions.
BMC Med
December 2024
Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Cochrane China and MAGIC China Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Article Synopsis
- * Researchers examined 220 systematic reviews published between December 2017 and December 2022, focusing on different clinical scenarios where NRSIs were justified for inclusion, with adverse outcomes being the most common reason.
- * Findings revealed that a significant portion of reviews did not assess compatibility before combining evidence types, leading to discrepancies in estimates; 35.5% showed qualitative disagreement and 46.5% indicated important differences between NRSIs and RCTs.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!