A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficiency assessment of cord blood banking and compatibility with delayed cord clamping. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Some people are trying to figure out if waiting to cut the umbilical cord affects how much useful blood can be collected for banking.
  • The study looked at data from hospitals in Spain where babies were born normally and compared how much blood was collected based on waiting 30 seconds, 60 seconds, or more than 120 seconds before clamping the cord.
  • They found that while waiting longer means you get less blood overall, the important parts of the blood still remained good, so all the waiting times still work for storing the blood for later use.

Article Abstract

Background: There is debate whether delayed umbilical cord clamping following delivery, the current gold standard, affects the proportion of cord blood units (CBU) suitable for public cord blood banking. This study was designed to assess the impact of delayed cord clamping on the number of CBU suitable for therapeutic uses.

Materials And Methods: To minimize variability, data from the four most active collection centers within the Programa Concordia (Spain) were included. Data on CBU collected in utero from mothers following normal vaginal deliveries from July 2018 to December 2021 were analyzed. The weight of the collection bags (as a surrogate of volume) and total nucleated cell (TNC) count were analyzed according to three defined clamping times: 30 s, 60 s and ≥120 s. The CBU were stratified as suitable for stem cell transplantation (≥110 g and ≥1,500×10 TNC/unit) or other clinical applications (≥100 g but TNC count below the threshold).

Results: - There were 131 (18%), 548 (76%), and 40 (5%) CBU collected at 30 s, 60 s and ≥120 s, respectively. The median weight of the CBU decreased gradually with time, with a significant difference between units collected when the cord was clamped at 30 s or 60 s (p=0.036), so significantly fewer CBU met the minimal weight criterion (100 g) at 60 s than at 30 s (p=0.002). However, this was not reflected by the TNC available, resulting in non-statistical differences in CBU eligible for banking between these times. The major predictor of collection success was the neonate's birth-weight.

Discussion: -Despite decreases in the volume of cord blood collected when cord clamping at 30 s or 60 s, TNC count is maintained resulting in similar numbers of CBU eligible for banking. The different clamping delays investigated in this study are, therefore, compatible with public cord blood banking needs.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2450/BloodTransfus.767DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cord blood
20
cord clamping
16
blood banking
12
tnc count
12
cord
10
cbu
9
delayed cord
8
cbu suitable
8
public cord
8
cbu collected
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!