A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Predicting 10-Year Risk of Pancreatic Cancer Using a Combined Genetic and Clinical Model. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Pancreatic cancer has low survival rates but early diagnosis improves outcomes; thus, identifying at-risk individuals for targeted screening is crucial.* -
  • A study using UK Biobank data developed a combined risk prediction model that incorporates both genetic (polygenic) and clinical factors to assess 10-year pancreatic cancer risks.* -
  • The combined risk score demonstrated the best discrimination between affected and unaffected individuals, suggesting it can effectively identify those at higher risk for targeted early screening.*

Article Abstract

Background And Aims: Pancreatic cancer has the poorest 5-year survival rate of any major solid tumor, but when diagnosed at an early stage, survival rates improve. Population screening is impractical because pancreatic cancer is rare with a lifetime risk of 1.7%, but accurate risk stratification in the general population could enable health care providers to focus early detection strategies to at-risk individuals. Here, we validate a combined risk prediction model that integrates a polygenic risk score and a clinical risk model.

Methods: Using the UK Biobank, we conducted a prospective cohort study assessing 10-year pancreatic cancer risks based on a polygenic risk score, a clinical risk score, and a combined risk score. We assessed the association, discrimination, calibration, cumulative hazards, and standardized incidence ratios compared to population incidence rates for the risk scores. We also conducted net reclassification analyses.

Results: While all of the risk scores discriminated well between affected and unaffected participants, the combined risk score - with a Harrell's C-index of 0.714 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.698, 0.730) - discriminated better than both the polygenic risk score ( = .001) and the clinical risk score ( = .02). In terms of calibration, there was no problem with dispersion for the combined risk score (β = 0.952, 95% CI = 0.865-1.039,  = .3) and overall there was a small overestimation of risk (α = -0.089, 95% CI = -0.156 to -0.021,  = .009). Participants in the top decile of 10-year risk were at 1.413 (95% CI = 1.242-1.607) times population risk.

Conclusion: The combined risk score was able to identify individuals at substantially increased risk of pancreatic cancer and to whom targeted screening could be useful.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11308393PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gastha.2023.05.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk score
36
pancreatic cancer
20
combined risk
20
risk
19
polygenic risk
12
clinical risk
12
score
9
10-year risk
8
risk pancreatic
8
score clinical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!